Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Changing Culture of a Factory.
1952283 citationsOrvis F. Collins, Elliott JaquesAmerican Sociological Reviewprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Elliott Jaques
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Elliott Jaques's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elliott Jaques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elliott Jaques more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elliott Jaques. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elliott Jaques. The network helps show where Elliott Jaques may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elliott Jaques
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elliott Jaques.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elliott Jaques based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Elliott Jaques. Elliott Jaques is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jaques, Elliott. (1995). Reply to Dr. Gilles Amado. Human Relations. 48(4). 359–365.12 indexed citations
6.
Jaques, Elliott, et al.. (1994). Human Capability: A Study of Individual Potential and Its Application. Medical Entomology and Zoology.38 indexed citations
7.
Jaques, Elliott. (1990). In praise of hierarchy.. PubMed. 68(1). 127–33.175 indexed citations
Jaques, Elliott. (1982). The Method of Social Analysis in Social Change and Social Research. DigitalCommons - WayneState (Wayne State University). 1(1). 7.3 indexed citations
Jaques, Elliott. (1978). Health services : their nature and organization, and the role of patients, doctors, nurses, and the complementary professions. Medical Entomology and Zoology.4 indexed citations
12.
Jaques, Elliott. (1970). Work, creativity, and social justice. Medical Entomology and Zoology.38 indexed citations
13.
Jaques, Elliott, et al.. (1965). Glacier project papers : some essays on organization and management from the Glacier Project Research. Heinemann eBooks.6 indexed citations
Jaques, Elliott. (1964). Time-span handbook : the use of time-span of discretion to measure the level of work in employment roles and to arrange an equitable payment structure. Heinemann eBooks.9 indexed citations
16.
Jaques, Elliott, et al.. (1964). Product analysis pricing : a method for setting policies for the delegation of pricing decisions and the control of expense and profitability. Heinemann eBooks.1 indexed citations
Jaques, Elliott, et al.. (1957). Measurement of Responsibility.. The Economic Journal. 67(265). 129–129.59 indexed citations
19.
Collins, Orvis F. & Elliott Jaques. (1952). The Changing Culture of a Factory.. American Sociological Review. 17(6). 794–794.283 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.