Elizabeth Eger
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics
- History top 2%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Co-authors
- Maxine BergCatherine AshcraftKimberly A. ScottJennifer A. ScarduzioJoëlle M. CruzSarah J. TracyDaniel CarterMaria Edgeworth
- Topics
- Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers)Gender, Feminism, and Media (2 papers)Historical Art and Culture Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Elizabeth Eger
17 papers receiving 205 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Sociology and Political Science 81
- Economics and Econometrics 67
- History 62
- Gender Studies 46
- Literature and Literary Theory 37
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Eger
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Eger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Eger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Eger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Eger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Eger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Eger. The network helps show where Elizabeth Eger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Eger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Eger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Eger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Eger. Elizabeth Eger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | Communicating Organizational and Transgender Intersectional Identities: an Ethnography of a Transgender Outreach Center | 1 |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 49 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | Brilliant Women: 18th-Century Bluestockings | 6 |
| 16 | Popular tales : early lessons : whim for whim | 1 |
| 17 | The parent's assistant ; Moral tales for young people | 1 |
| 18 | Luxury in the eighteenth century : debates, desires and delectable goods | 72 |
| 19 | 48 | |
| 20 | Out rushed a female to protect the bard : The Bluestocking defense of Shakespeare | 5 |
About Elizabeth Eger
Elizabeth Eger is a scholar working on Museology, Public Administration and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 20 papers that have together received 267 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (2 papers) and Historical Art and Culture Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Museology (27 citations), Computer Science Applications (33 citations) and History (62 citations). Elizabeth Eger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Maxine Berg, Catherine Ashcraft, Kimberly A. Scott, Jennifer A. Scarduzio, Joëlle M. Cruz, Sarah J. Tracy, Daniel Carter and Maria Edgeworth. Their work appears in journals such as Management Communication Quarterly, Anthropology & Education Quarterly and Feminist Media Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.