Catherine Ashcraft

841 total citations
38 papers, 534 citations indexed

About

Catherine Ashcraft is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Catherine Ashcraft has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 534 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Gender Studies, 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 9 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Catherine Ashcraft's work include Gender, Feminism, and Media (8 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (8 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (4 papers). Catherine Ashcraft is often cited by papers focused on Gender, Feminism, and Media (8 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (8 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (4 papers). Catherine Ashcraft collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Sweden. Catherine Ashcraft's co-authors include Karen Tracy, Kimberly A. Scott, Elizabeth Eger, Kenneth R. Howe, Anthony Breitzman, Wendy DuBow, Kelly W. Jones, Theresa Selfa, Heidi Asbjornsen and Bruce E. Larson and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Climatic Change and Resources Conservation and Recycling.

In The Last Decade

Catherine Ashcraft

36 papers receiving 484 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Catherine Ashcraft United States 15 176 154 129 96 49 38 534
Jessie McLean Australia 15 192 1.1× 66 0.4× 69 0.5× 46 0.5× 22 0.4× 40 551
Rob VanWynsberghe Canada 10 281 1.6× 118 0.8× 108 0.8× 45 0.5× 80 1.6× 17 549
Matthew DeBell United States 13 207 1.2× 57 0.4× 203 1.6× 36 0.4× 44 0.9× 21 561
Nour Dados Australia 3 237 1.3× 63 0.4× 68 0.5× 19 0.2× 31 0.6× 9 552
J. Patrick Williams United States 18 576 3.3× 156 1.0× 56 0.4× 30 0.3× 87 1.8× 51 1.1k
Sarah N. Gatson United States 11 261 1.5× 31 0.2× 61 0.5× 19 0.2× 73 1.5× 20 471
Darlene E. Clover Canada 15 270 1.5× 26 0.2× 252 2.0× 25 0.3× 41 0.8× 78 650
Meghan Cope United States 12 518 2.9× 57 0.4× 63 0.5× 117 1.2× 135 2.8× 17 1.1k
Courtney Quinn United States 11 174 1.0× 35 0.2× 137 1.1× 216 2.3× 15 0.3× 26 805
Rachel Masika United Kingdom 12 125 0.7× 26 0.2× 200 1.6× 25 0.3× 29 0.6× 20 458

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Ashcraft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Ashcraft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Ashcraft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Ashcraft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Ashcraft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Ashcraft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Ashcraft. The network helps show where Catherine Ashcraft may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine Ashcraft

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine Ashcraft. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine Ashcraft based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine Ashcraft. Catherine Ashcraft is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ashcraft, Catherine, et al.. (2025). Gamifying water crisis management: A serious game for drinking water contamination emergency response. PLoS ONE. 20(4). e0321210–e0321210.
2.
Rogers, Shannon, et al.. (2024). A Community-Based Approach to the Nature Economy: Insights from Outdoor Recreation, Environmental Conservation, and Economic Development. Journal of Outdoor Recreation Education and Leadership.
3.
Selfa, Theresa, Catherine Ashcraft, Heidi Asbjornsen, et al.. (2022). Using science-based role-play simulations to inform payment for hydrological services program design in Mexico. Environmental Science & Policy. 139. 71–82. 6 indexed citations
4.
Westman, Linda, James Patterson, Rachel Macrorie, et al.. (2022). Compound urban crises. AMBIO. 51(6). 1402–1415. 32 indexed citations
5.
Selfa, Theresa, et al.. (2021). Uncovering Stakeholder Participation in Payment for Hydrological Services (PHS) Program Decision Making in Mexico and Colombia. Sustainability. 13(15). 8562–8562. 10 indexed citations
6.
Ashcraft, Catherine, et al.. (2020). A framework for implementing socially just climate adaptation. Climatic Change. 160(1). 1–14. 93 indexed citations
7.
Ashcraft, Catherine, et al.. (2020). New England Food Policy Council Survey Results. University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester). 1 indexed citations
8.
Weir, Michael J., et al.. (2020). Language effects on bargaining. PLoS ONE. 15(3). e0229501–e0229501. 1 indexed citations
9.
Ashcraft, Catherine, et al.. (2020). I’ll be dammed! Public preferences regarding dam removal in New Hampshire. Elementa Science of the Anthropocene. 8(1). 7 indexed citations
10.
Ashcraft, Catherine, et al.. (2019). People and Conflicts in Dammed New England Landscapes: From a Stakeholder Assessment to a Science-Based Role-Play Simulation. University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester). 1 indexed citations
11.
Fiez, T.S., et al.. (2017). Innovation, Startups, and Funding in the Age of Accelerations: A Survey of the Evolving Landscape. IEEE Solid-State Circuits Magazine. 9(4). 66–72. 1 indexed citations
12.
Ashcraft, Catherine, Elizabeth Eger, & Kimberly A. Scott. (2017). Becoming Technosocial Change Agents: Intersectionality and Culturally Responsive Pedagogies as Vital Resources for Increasing Girls’ Participation in Computing. Anthropology & Education Quarterly. 48(3). 233–251. 49 indexed citations
13.
DuBow, Wendy & Catherine Ashcraft. (2016). Male Allies: Motivations and Barriers for Participating in Diversity Initiatives in the Technology Workplace. CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder). 8(2). 160–180. 12 indexed citations
14.
Ashcraft, Catherine & Anthony Breitzman. (2012). Who Invents It? Women's Participation in Information Technology Patenting, 2012 Update. Rowan Digitals Works (Rowan University). 15 indexed citations
15.
Ashcraft, Catherine. (2008). So Much More Than “Sex Ed”: Teen Sexuality as Vehicle for Improving Academic Success and Democratic Education for Diverse Youth. American Educational Research Journal. 45(3). 631–667. 21 indexed citations
16.
Ashcraft, Catherine. (2006). Ready or Not …? Teen Sexuality and the Troubling Discourse of Readiness. Anthropology & Education Quarterly. 37(4). 328–346. 17 indexed citations
17.
Ashcraft, Catherine. (2004). ‘It’s just semantics?’: investigating a school district’s decision to respect or value diversity. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 17(5). 685–706. 3 indexed citations
18.
Ashcraft, Catherine. (2003). Adolescent Ambiguities in American Pie. Youth & Society. 35(1). 37–70. 26 indexed citations
19.
Tracy, Karen & Catherine Ashcraft. (2001). Crafting policies about controversial values: How wording disputes manage a group dilemma. Journal of Applied Communication Research. 29(4). 297–316. 47 indexed citations
20.
Ashcraft, Catherine. (2000). Naming Knowledge: A Language for Reconstructing Domestic Violence and Systemic Gender Inequity. 23(1). 3. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026