Elizabeth Deeds Ermarth
-
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism 2
- Modernist Literature and Criticism 1
- History top 2%
- Philosophy, History, and Historiography 3
- Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics 1
- Philosophy top 5%
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Posthumanist Ethics and Activism 2
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 10%
- Visual Culture and Art Theory 1
-
- Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies 1
- Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy 1
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (2 papers)The Modern Language Review (1 paper)Critical Inquiry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Elizabeth Deeds Ermarth
28 papers receiving 236 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Literature and Literary Theory 109
- History 62
- Philosophy 64
- Cultural Studies 33
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 19
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Deeds Ermarth
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Deeds Ermarth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Deeds Ermarth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Deeds Ermarth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Deeds Ermarth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Deeds Ermarth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Deeds Ermarth. The network helps show where Elizabeth Deeds Ermarth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Elizabeth Deeds Ermarth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 10 | |
| 11 | Realism and Consensus in the English Novel: Time, Space and Narrative | 1998 | 15 |
| 12 | 1995 | 10 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 64 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 0 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1986 | 35 | |
| 17 | 1985 | 19 | |
| 18 | 1984 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1981 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1974 | 5 |
About Elizabeth Deeds Ermarth
Elizabeth Deeds Ermarth is a scholar working on History, Literature and Literary Theory and Cultural Studies, having authored 30 papers that have together received 362 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, History, and Historiography (3 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (2 papers), Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (2 papers), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (1 paper), Modernist Literature and Criticism (1 paper), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (1 paper), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (1 paper) and Visual Culture and Art Theory (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (109 citations), History (62 citations) and Philosophy (64 citations). Elizabeth Deeds Ermarth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Carolyn J. Dean, Ewa Domańska, Martin Price, John Preston, David M. Carr and Catherine Belsey. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Modern Language Review and Critical Inquiry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.