Elena J. Eisman
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Applied Psychology top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Lorraine D. EydeRobert R. DiesGregory J. MeyerStephen E. FinnTom KubiszynGary G. KayKevin L. MorelandGeoffrey M. Reed
- Topics
- Counseling Practices and Supervision (8 papers)Psychological Testing and Assessment (8 papers)Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (6 papers)
- Journals
- American PsychologistJournal of Personality AssessmentProfessional Psychology Research and Practice
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaCanada
In The Last Decade
Elena J. Eisman
13 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Clinical Psychology 757
- Social Psychology 580
- Applied Psychology 522
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 261
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 214
Countries citing papers authored by Elena J. Eisman
This map shows the geographic impact of Elena J. Eisman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elena J. Eisman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elena J. Eisman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elena J. Eisman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elena J. Eisman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elena J. Eisman. The network helps show where Elena J. Eisman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elena J. Eisman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elena J. Eisman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elena J. Eisman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elena J. Eisman. Elena J. Eisman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 363 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 83 | |
| 9 | Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues.breakdown → | 866 |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 42 | |
| 14 | 105 |
About Elena J. Eisman
Elena J. Eisman is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Counseling Practices and Supervision (8 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (8 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (522 citations), General Psychology (107 citations) and Clinical Psychology (757 citations). Elena J. Eisman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Lorraine D. Eyde, Robert R. Dies, Gregory J. Meyer, Stephen E. Finn, Tom Kubiszyn, Gary G. Kay, Kevin L. Moreland, Geoffrey M. Reed, Paul D. Nelson and Pierre L.‐J. Ritchie. Their work appears in journals such as American Psychologist, Journal of Personality Assessment and Professional Psychology Research and Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.