Robert R. Dies

3.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
61 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Robert R. Dies is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert R. Dies has authored 61 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in Clinical Psychology, 25 papers in Social Psychology and 16 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Robert R. Dies's work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (30 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (16 papers) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (15 papers). Robert R. Dies is often cited by papers focused on Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (30 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (16 papers) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (15 papers). Robert R. Dies collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Robert R. Dies's co-authors include K. Roy MacKenzie, Elena J. Eisman, Lorraine D. Eyde, Gregory J. Meyer, Stephen E. Finn, Tom Kubiszyn, Gary G. Kay, Kevin L. Moreland, Geoffrey M. Reed and Volker Tschuschke and has published in prestigious journals such as American Psychologist, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Robert R. Dies

59 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Hit Papers

Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A rev... 2001 2026 2009 2017 2001 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert R. Dies United States 19 1.3k 793 546 293 187 61 2.0k
E. Thomas Dowd United States 23 871 0.7× 637 0.8× 249 0.5× 284 1.0× 253 1.4× 94 1.7k
Merton S. Krause United States 19 1.3k 1.0× 546 0.7× 232 0.4× 430 1.5× 159 0.9× 90 2.1k
Carol Tomlinson‐Keasey United States 20 781 0.6× 653 0.8× 469 0.9× 490 1.7× 255 1.4× 54 2.1k
Luciano L’Abate United States 24 1.4k 1.1× 1.1k 1.3× 196 0.4× 183 0.6× 315 1.7× 173 2.2k
Morris B. Parloff United States 21 1.5k 1.1× 628 0.8× 184 0.3× 242 0.8× 160 0.9× 44 2.1k
Chris Piotrowski United States 23 769 0.6× 404 0.5× 544 1.0× 288 1.0× 120 0.6× 93 1.5k
Georgiana Shick Tryon United States 20 1.2k 1.0× 940 1.2× 204 0.4× 193 0.7× 154 0.8× 89 2.0k
Kevin L. Moreland United States 14 683 0.5× 301 0.4× 607 1.1× 300 1.0× 107 0.6× 39 1.4k
Allan R. Harkness United States 19 1.3k 1.0× 322 0.4× 327 0.6× 473 1.6× 241 1.3× 31 2.2k
Howard N. Garb United States 27 1.6k 1.3× 494 0.6× 1.0k 1.9× 346 1.2× 274 1.5× 80 2.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Robert R. Dies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert R. Dies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert R. Dies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert R. Dies more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert R. Dies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert R. Dies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert R. Dies. The network helps show where Robert R. Dies may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert R. Dies

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert R. Dies. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert R. Dies based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert R. Dies. Robert R. Dies is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dies, Robert R.. (2008). The Use of Questionnaires in Child Custody Evaluations. Journal of Child Custody. 4(1-2). 103–122. 1 indexed citations
2.
Eisman, Elena J., Robert R. Dies, Stephen E. Finn, et al.. (2000). Problems and limitations in using psychological assessment in the contemporary health care delivery system.. Professional Psychology Research and Practice. 31(2). 131–140. 35 indexed citations
3.
Tschuschke, Volker & Robert R. Dies. (1994). Intensive Analysis of Therapeutic Factors and Outcome in Long-Term Inpatient Groups. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy. 44(2). 185–208. 100 indexed citations
4.
McNary, Scot & Robert R. Dies. (1993). Cotherapist modeling in group psychotherapy: Fact or fantasy?. Group. 17(3). 131–142. 5 indexed citations
5.
Dies, Robert R.. (1993). Writing for Publication: Overcoming Common Obstacles. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy. 43(2). 243–249. 16 indexed citations
6.
Dies, Robert R., et al.. (1993). The Role of Evaluation in Clinical Practice: Overview and Group Treatment Illustration. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy. 43(1). 77–105. 8 indexed citations
7.
Dies, Robert R., et al.. (1991). Process Variables Mediating Change in Intensive Group Therapy Training. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy. 41(3). 379–397. 9 indexed citations
8.
Dies, Robert R., et al.. (1990). The Impact of Observers on Group Process and Content. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy. 40(3). 323–338. 7 indexed citations
9.
Dies, Robert R., et al.. (1985). Guidelines for Authors. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy. 35(3). 457–470. 3 indexed citations
10.
Dies, Robert R.. (1985). Leadership in Short-Term Group Therapy: Manipulation or Facilitation?. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy. 35(3). 435–455. 19 indexed citations
11.
Dies, Robert R. & K. Roy MacKenzie. (1983). Advances in group psychotherapy : integrating research and practice. 250 indexed citations
12.
Plaut, S. Michael, et al.. (1980). Improving Staff-Student Relations: Effects of a Humanistic Medicine Programme. Medical Teacher. 2(1). 32–39. 1 indexed citations
13.
Dies, Robert R., et al.. (1978). Effects of experimental manipulation of self-disclosure on group cohesiveness.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 46(6). 1171–1177. 40 indexed citations
14.
Dies, Robert R., et al.. (1974). A brief encounter group experience and social relationships in a dormitory.. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 21(2). 112–115. 3 indexed citations
15.
Dies, Robert R.. (1974). Attitudes Toward the Training of Group Psychotherapists. Small Group Behavior. 5(1). 65–79. 22 indexed citations
16.
Dies, Robert R., et al.. (1974). Reactions of internal and external test-anxious students to counseling and behavior therapies.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 42(6). 921–921. 26 indexed citations
17.
Dies, Robert R.. (1973). Group therapist self-disclosure: Development and validation of a scale.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 41(1). 97–103. 12 indexed citations
18.
Dies, Robert R. & Allen K. Hess. (1970). Self-Disclosure, Time Perspective and Semantic- Differential Changes. 1(4). 387–395. 5 indexed citations
19.
Dies, Robert R.. (1968). ELECTROCONVULSIVE THERAPY. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 146(4). 334–342. 3 indexed citations
20.
Dies, Robert R.. (1968). Development of a Projective Measure of Perceived Locus of Control. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment. 32(5). 487–490. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026