Geoffrey M. Reed
- Clinical Psychology top 0.2%
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.5%
- Applied Psychology top 0.2%
- General Health Professions top 1%
- Co-authors
- Shelley E. TaylorMargaret E. KemenyJulienne E. BowerShekhar SaxenaMichael B. FirstTara L. GruenewaldMike CrawfordPeter Tyrer
- Topics
- Mental Health and Psychiatry (46 papers)Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (29 papers)Mental Health Treatment and Access (26 papers)
- Journals
- The LancetSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAmerican Psychologist
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandMexico
In The Last Decade
Geoffrey M. Reed
155 papers receiving 9.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 180
- Clinical Psychology 5.2k
- Social Psychology 2.2k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.8k
- Applied Psychology 1.2k
- General Health Professions 1.2k
Countries citing papers authored by Geoffrey M. Reed
This map shows the geographic impact of Geoffrey M. Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geoffrey M. Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoffrey M. Reed more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Geoffrey M. Reed
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geoffrey M. Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geoffrey M. Reed. The network helps show where Geoffrey M. Reed may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Geoffrey M. Reed
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Geoffrey M. Reed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Geoffrey M. Reed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Geoffrey M. Reed. Geoffrey M. Reed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 42 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 78 | |
| 14 | A review of current evidence regarding the ICD-11 proposals for diagnosing PTSD and complex PTSDbreakdown → | 441 |
| 15 | 108 | |
| 16 | Classification, assessment, prevalence, and effect of personality disorderbreakdown → | 404 |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | Qué es la CIE y por qué es importante en la psicología | 6 |
| 19 | 28 | |
| 20 | 24 |
About Geoffrey M. Reed
Geoffrey M. Reed is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Philosophy and Clinical Psychology, having authored 162 papers that have together received 9.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (46 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (29 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (26 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (5.2k citations), Applied Psychology (1.2k citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (1.8k citations). Geoffrey M. Reed has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Shelley E. Taylor, Margaret E. Kemeny, Julienne E. Bower, Shekhar Saxena, Michael B. First, Tara L. Gruenewald, Mike Crawford, Peter Tyrer, Rebeca Robles and Michael C. Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and American Psychologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.