Elaine Doyle

2.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
29 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Elaine Doyle is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Economics and Econometrics and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Elaine Doyle has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Information Systems and Management, 9 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 7 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Elaine Doyle's work include Ethics in Business and Education (12 papers), Taxation and Compliance Studies (6 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers). Elaine Doyle is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Business and Education (12 papers), Taxation and Compliance Studies (6 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers). Elaine Doyle collaborates with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and France. Elaine Doyle's co-authors include Patrick G. Buckley, Barbara Summers, Jane Frecknall‐Hughes, Joanne O’Flaherty, Shane Doyle, Keith W. Glaister, Sheila Killian, Peter Moizer, John Garvey and Michelle O’Sullivan and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Computers & Education and Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.

In The Last Decade

Elaine Doyle

28 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

Gamification and student motivation 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Elaine Doyle Ireland 15 637 365 282 217 186 29 1.2k
Olga Zlatkin‐Troitschanskaia Germany 20 256 0.4× 894 2.4× 101 0.4× 131 0.6× 101 0.5× 107 1.2k
Sylvia Beyer United States 18 188 0.3× 460 1.3× 499 1.8× 340 1.6× 172 0.9× 33 1.9k
Sawsen Lakhal Canada 19 182 0.3× 726 2.0× 224 0.8× 257 1.2× 166 0.9× 56 1.3k
Wenhao David Huang United States 17 485 0.8× 508 1.4× 257 0.9× 323 1.5× 235 1.3× 43 1.4k
Sara Catalán Spain 18 374 0.6× 157 0.4× 108 0.4× 373 1.7× 76 0.4× 30 984
Laura Benton United Kingdom 16 301 0.5× 323 0.9× 246 0.9× 144 0.7× 105 0.6× 45 1.0k
Bashar H. Malkawi United Arab Emirates 6 71 0.1× 683 1.9× 181 0.6× 148 0.7× 345 1.9× 47 1.3k
Saedah Siraj Malaysia 18 182 0.3× 804 2.2× 72 0.3× 169 0.8× 320 1.7× 146 1.3k
Diana R. Sanchez United States 10 217 0.3× 132 0.4× 85 0.3× 253 1.2× 77 0.4× 22 965
Tira Nur Fitria Indonesia 17 188 0.3× 415 1.1× 104 0.4× 202 0.9× 468 2.5× 155 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Elaine Doyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elaine Doyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elaine Doyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elaine Doyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elaine Doyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elaine Doyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elaine Doyle. The network helps show where Elaine Doyle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elaine Doyle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elaine Doyle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elaine Doyle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elaine Doyle. Elaine Doyle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Blaylock, Bradley S., et al.. (2022). Tax-Motivated Income Shifting in Audit Firm Networks: Comparing Big 4 and non-Big 4 Firms. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations
2.
Doyle, Elaine, et al.. (2020). The impact of content co-creation on academic achievement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 46(3). 494–507. 23 indexed citations
3.
Doyle, Elaine & Patrick G. Buckley. (2020). The impact of co-creation: an analysis of the effectiveness of student authored multiple choice questions on achievement of learning outcomes. Interactive Learning Environments. 30(9). 1726–1735. 16 indexed citations
4.
Doyle, Elaine, et al.. (2018). Assessment co-creation: an exploratory analysis of opportunities and challenges based on student and instructor perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education. 24(6). 739–754. 26 indexed citations
5.
Buckley, Patrick G., Elaine Doyle, & Shane Doyle. (2017). Game on! students' perceptions of gamified learning. Educational Technology & Society. 20(3). 1–10. 41 indexed citations
6.
O’Sullivan, Michelle, et al.. (2016). Employee voice and silence in auditing firms. Employee Relations. 38(4). 563–577. 25 indexed citations
7.
Doyle, Elaine, et al.. (2016). Innovative Business Education Design for 21st Century Learning. DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven). 7 indexed citations
8.
Frecknall‐Hughes, Jane, Peter Moizer, Elaine Doyle, & Barbara Summers. (2016). An Examination of Ethical Influences on the Work of Tax Practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics. 146(4). 729–745. 28 indexed citations
9.
Buckley, Patrick G. & Elaine Doyle. (2015). Using web-based collaborative forecasting to enhance information literacy and disciplinary knowledge. Interactive Learning Environments. 24(7). 1574–1589. 9 indexed citations
10.
Buckley, Patrick G. & Elaine Doyle. (2014). Gamification and student motivation. Interactive Learning Environments. 24(6). 1162–1175. 546 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Doyle, Elaine, Jane Frecknall‐Hughes, & Barbara Summers. (2013). Ethics in Tax Practice: A Study of the Effect of Practitioner Firm Size. Journal of Business Ethics. 122(4). 623–641. 29 indexed citations
12.
Doyle, Elaine & Joanne O’Flaherty. (2013). The impact of education level and type on moral reasoning. Irish Educational Studies. 32(3). 377–393. 35 indexed citations
13.
Doyle, Elaine, et al.. (2013). An empirical analysis of the ethical reasoning process of tax practitioners. 3 indexed citations
14.
O’Flaherty, Joanne & Elaine Doyle. (2012). Making the case for moral development education. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 38(2). 147–162. 7 indexed citations
15.
Doyle, Elaine, et al.. (2012). An Empirical Analysis of the Ethical Reasoning of Tax Practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics. 114(2). 325–339. 37 indexed citations
16.
Doyle, Elaine. (2011). Is a house enough? Service users’ perspectives on the reasons for repeat admissions to a female homeless service (Edel House). Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology). 63.
17.
Mullins, Martin & Elaine Doyle. (2010). Establishing a Research Ethics Committee in a Business School: A Chairperson's Perspective. Research Ethics. 6(4). 134–142. 1 indexed citations
18.
Doyle, Elaine, Jane Frecknall‐Hughes, & Barbara Summers. (2009). Research Methods in Taxation Ethics: Developing the Defining Issues Test (DIT) for a Tax-Specific Scenario. Journal of Business Ethics. 88(1). 35–52. 23 indexed citations
19.
Doyle, Elaine, et al.. (2008). Linking Ethics and Risk Management in Taxation: Evidence from an Exploratory Study in Ireland and the UK. Journal of Business Ethics. 86(2). 177–198. 36 indexed citations
20.
Killian, Sheila & Elaine Doyle. (2005). Tax aggression among tax professionals: the case of South Africa. University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick). 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026