Drc Chalmers

17.7k total citations
73 papers, 691 citations indexed

About

Drc Chalmers is a scholar working on Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Drc Chalmers has authored 73 papers receiving a total of 691 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Physiology, 38 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 9 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Drc Chalmers's work include Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (39 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (35 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (8 papers). Drc Chalmers is often cited by papers focused on Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (39 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (35 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (8 papers). Drc Chalmers collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Drc Chalmers's co-authors include Dianne Nicol, Margaret Otlowski, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Yann Joly, Christine Critchley, Martin Bobrow, X. Zhang, R. E. Schmidt, Edward S. Dove and Tess Whitton and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Drc Chalmers

65 papers receiving 650 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Drc Chalmers Australia 14 366 217 123 105 97 73 691
Bartha Maria Knoppers Canada 14 268 0.7× 159 0.7× 162 1.3× 124 1.2× 54 0.6× 25 646
Emmanuelle Rial‐Sebbag France 14 401 1.1× 316 1.5× 292 2.4× 221 2.1× 88 0.9× 70 886
Gail Javitt United States 15 280 0.8× 177 0.8× 548 4.5× 130 1.2× 56 0.6× 34 927
Juli Bollinger United States 16 505 1.4× 207 1.0× 426 3.5× 89 0.8× 172 1.8× 50 910
Laura Lyman Rodriguez United States 14 440 1.2× 191 0.9× 275 2.2× 129 1.2× 171 1.8× 24 797
Mary A. Majumder United States 14 222 0.6× 79 0.4× 146 1.2× 60 0.6× 113 1.2× 65 609
Béatrice Godard Canada 20 522 1.4× 212 1.0× 632 5.1× 187 1.8× 195 2.0× 75 1.3k
Stuart Hogarth United Kingdom 12 178 0.5× 118 0.5× 258 2.1× 73 0.7× 71 0.7× 28 563
Anya E. R. Prince United States 15 207 0.6× 82 0.4× 310 2.5× 82 0.8× 74 0.8× 53 644
Naomi Hawkins United Kingdom 10 279 0.8× 112 0.5× 197 1.6× 73 0.7× 37 0.4× 22 542

Countries citing papers authored by Drc Chalmers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Drc Chalmers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Drc Chalmers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Drc Chalmers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Drc Chalmers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Drc Chalmers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Drc Chalmers. The network helps show where Drc Chalmers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Drc Chalmers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Drc Chalmers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Drc Chalmers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Drc Chalmers. Drc Chalmers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nicol, Dianne, et al.. (2019). Public reactions to direct-to-consumer genetic health tests: A comparison across the US, UK, Japan and Australia. European Journal of Human Genetics. 28(3). 339–348. 8 indexed citations
2.
Nicol, Dianne, et al.. (2017). The path to reducing duplication of human research ethics review in Australia. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations
3.
Chalmers, Drc, Peter D. Rathjen, Joy Rathjen, & Dianne Nicol. (2017). Ethics and Governance of Stem Cell Banks. Methods in molecular biology. 1590. 99–112. 3 indexed citations
4.
Chalmers, Drc, Dianne Nicol, Jane Kaye, et al.. (2016). Has the biobank bubble burst? Withstanding the challenges for sustainable biobanking in the digital era. BMC Medical Ethics. 17(1). 39–39. 84 indexed citations
5.
Joly, Yann, Derek So, Martin Bobrow, et al.. (2016). A decision tool to guide the ethics review of a challenging breed of emerging genomic projects. European Journal of Human Genetics. 24(8). 1099–1103. 1 indexed citations
6.
Chalmers, Drc. (2015). Medical Research: future directions in the genome era. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations
7.
Chalmers, Drc. (2015). Biobanking and Privacy Laws in Australia. The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics. 43(4). 703–713. 4 indexed citations
8.
Chalmers, Drc, Peter D. Rathjen, Joy Rathjen, & Dianne Nicol. (2013). Stem cells and regenerative medicine: From research to clinical applications. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations
9.
10.
Chalmers, Drc. (2010). Stem Cell Technology: From Research Regulation to Clinical Application. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations
11.
Chalmers, Drc. (2010). Genetic Research and Biobanks. Methods in molecular biology. 675. 1–37. 21 indexed citations
12.
Nicol, Dianne, et al.. (2008). Submission to the OECD on the Draft Guidelines for Human Biobanks and Genetic Research Databases. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 7 indexed citations
13.
Chalmers, Drc. (2007). Draft 'Ethical Guidelines on the use of Assisted Reproductive Technology in Clinical Practice and Research'. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations
14.
Chalmers, Drc, et al.. (2007). Equity & Trusts in Australia.
15.
Chalmers, Drc. (2006). Privacy and Biobank Research: Weighing Private and Public Interests. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 17(2006). 30–52. 1 indexed citations
16.
Chalmers, Drc, et al.. (2004). Equity and Trusts in Australia. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations
17.
Nicol, Dianne, et al.. (2002). Regulating Biomedical Advances: Embryonic Stem Cell Research. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
18.
Nicol, Dianne, et al.. (2002). Regulating Biomedial Advances: Embryonic Stem Cell Research. 2(1). 31–59. 5 indexed citations
19.
Nicol, Dianne, et al.. (2001). Human Cloning and Stem Cell Research. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 3 indexed citations
20.
Chalmers, Drc, Margaret Otlowski, Dianne Nicol, & Loane Skene. (1995). Current Research: Project on the Legal and Ethical Aspects of Genetic Research in Australia. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026