Michael Burgess

3.9k citations
94 papers · 2.1k indexed · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Burgess

87 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Michael Burgess
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 832
  • General Health Professions 492
  • Communication 100
  • Physiology 371
  • Research and Theory 10
Replace Ruth Chadwick with:
Ruth Chadwick United Kingdom
Kieran C. O’Doherty Canada
Lynn Gillam Australia
Henry S. Richardson United States
Gerald Dworkin United States
Charles E. Rosenberg United States
Jane Miller United States
Anne Kerr United Kingdom
Catherine Waldby Australia
Tiago Moreira United Kingdom
Michael Burgess relative to Ruth Chadwick United Kingdom Ruth Chadwick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Ruth Chadwick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Burgess

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Burgess's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Burgess with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Burgess more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Burgess

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Burgess. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Burgess. The network helps show where Michael Burgess may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Burgess, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Burgess Line = papers co-authored together Michael Burgess links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20233
3 20219
4 20212
5 202017
6 201920
7 201920
8 201816
9 20187
10 201730
11 201535
12 201212
13 201275
14 200898
15 200897
16
Comparing methods of ethical consultation for biotechnology related issues.
20065
17 200199
18 199417
19 19946
20 19931

About Michael Burgess

Michael Burgess is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Physiology, Transplantation and Computer Science Applications, having authored 94 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (32 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (20 papers), Ethics in medical practice (15 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (10 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (8 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (7 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (6 papers) and Risk Perception and Management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (832 citations), General Health Professions (492 citations), Communication (100 citations), Physiology (371 citations) and Research and Theory (10 citations). Michael Burgess has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kieran C. O’Doherty, Jack E. Hokanson, David Secko, Alice K. Hawkins, Holly Longstaff, Simon Niemeyer, Michael F. Cohen, Jane Kaye, Kelly Edwards and Bryn Williams–Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Public Understanding of Science, Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, Nursing Research and BMC Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026