Jane Kaye

33.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
118 papers, 4.1k citations indexed

About

Jane Kaye is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Kaye has authored 118 papers receiving a total of 4.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 84 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 46 papers in Physiology and 23 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Jane Kaye's work include Ethics in Clinical Research (78 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (45 papers) and Genomics and Rare Diseases (14 papers). Jane Kaye is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Clinical Research (78 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (45 papers) and Genomics and Rare Diseases (14 papers). Jane Kaye collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Jane Kaye's co-authors include Harriet Teare, David J. Lund, Edgar A. Whitley, Naomi Hawkins, Karen Melham, Michael Morrison, Jantina de Vries, Paula Boddington, Catherine Heeney and Megan Prictor and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, The Lancet and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Jane Kaye

115 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Hit Papers

Dynamic consent: a patien... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 100 200 300 400

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Jane Kaye 2.5k 1.3k 804 802 459 118 4.1k
Mildred K. Cho 1.8k 0.7× 764 0.6× 1.2k 1.5× 889 1.1× 218 0.5× 162 6.0k
Ellen Wright Clayton 2.0k 0.8× 794 0.6× 2.1k 2.6× 716 0.9× 546 1.2× 194 6.2k
Mark A. Rothstein 1.3k 0.5× 546 0.4× 1.1k 1.4× 595 0.7× 213 0.5× 226 3.3k
Timothy Caulfield 2.2k 0.9× 1.9k 1.4× 973 1.2× 672 0.8× 140 0.3× 292 5.5k
Michael Parker 2.5k 1.0× 747 0.6× 1.7k 2.1× 1.3k 1.6× 213 0.5× 239 7.7k
Pascal Borry 1.9k 0.8× 737 0.5× 2.3k 2.8× 751 0.9× 142 0.3× 251 5.2k
Bartha Maria Knoppers 3.6k 1.4× 1.7k 1.3× 2.8k 3.5× 804 1.0× 523 1.1× 359 7.4k
Stephanie M. Fullerton 1.5k 0.6× 801 0.6× 2.1k 2.6× 469 0.6× 161 0.4× 133 4.4k
Jantina de Vries 1.3k 0.5× 556 0.4× 1.2k 1.5× 331 0.4× 114 0.2× 98 3.1k
Annelien L. Bredenoord 986 0.4× 659 0.5× 511 0.6× 304 0.4× 126 0.3× 138 3.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Kaye

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Kaye's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Kaye with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Kaye more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Kaye

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Kaye. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Kaye. The network helps show where Jane Kaye may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Kaye

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Kaye. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Kaye based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Kaye. Jane Kaye is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tanaka, Akio, Ryo� Saito, Kazumasa Iwamoto, et al.. (2024). Survey of hereditary angioedema episodes and quality of life impairment through a patient-participatory registry. Journal of Cutaneous Immunology and Allergy. 7.
2.
Alemu, Melaku Birhanu, Heidi Beate Bentzen, Jane Kaye, et al.. (2023). Public Preferences for Digital Health Data Sharing: Discrete Choice Experiment Study in 12 European Countries. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 25. e47066–e47066. 9 indexed citations
3.
Shah, Nisha, et al.. (2021). Governance mechanisms for sharing of health data: An approach towards selecting attributes for complex discrete choice experiment studies. Technology in Society. 66. 101625–101625. 9 indexed citations
4.
Bentzen, Heidi Beate, et al.. (2021). Preferences of the Public for Sharing Health Data: Discrete Choice Experiment. JMIR Medical Informatics. 9(7). e29614–e29614. 20 indexed citations
5.
Coathup, Victoria, et al.. (2020). Landscape of Participant-Centric Initiatives for Medical Research in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 22(8). e16441–e16441. 2 indexed citations
7.
Bell, Jessica, et al.. (2019). Lawful disclosure of administrative data for research purposes in the UK. 2(3). 264–264. 1 indexed citations
8.
Mourby, Miranda, James Doidge, Kerina Jones, et al.. (2019). Health Data Linkage for Public Interest Research in the UK: Key Obstacles and Solutions. International Journal for Population Data Science. 4(1). 1093–1093. 14 indexed citations
9.
Parra-Calderón, Carlos Luís, Jane Kaye, Alberto Moreno-Conde, Harriet Teare, & Francisco J. Núñez-Benjumea. (2018). Desiderata for digital consent in genomic research. Journal of Community Genetics. 9(2). 191–194. 6 indexed citations
10.
Coathup, Victoria, et al.. (2017). Participant-Centric Initiatives and Medical Research: Scoping Review Protocol. JMIR Research Protocols. 6(12). e245–e245. 2 indexed citations
11.
Clercq, Eva De, Jane Kaye, Susan M. Wolf, Barbara A. Koenig, & Bernice S. Elger. (2017). Returning Results in Biobank Research: Global Trends and Solutions. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers. 21(3). 128–131. 18 indexed citations
12.
Spencer, Karen, Caroline Sanders, Edgar A. Whitley, et al.. (2016). Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 18(4). e66–e66. 138 indexed citations
13.
Kaye, Jane, et al.. (2016). Access Governance for Biobanks: The Case of the BioSHaRE-EU Cohorts. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 14(3). 201–206. 19 indexed citations
14.
Budin‐Ljøsne, Isabelle, Deborah Mascalzoni, Sirpa Soini, et al.. (2016). Feedback of Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants: Is It Feasible in Europe?. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 14(3). 241–248. 18 indexed citations
15.
Kaye, Jane, Liam Curren, Jessica Bell, et al.. (2016). Consent for Biobanking: The Legal Frameworks of Countries in the BioSHaRE-EU Project. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 14(3). 195–200. 25 indexed citations
16.
Minari, Jusaku, Harriet Teare, Colin Mitchell, Jane Kaye, & Yoshihiro Kato. (2014). The emerging need for family-centric initiatives for obtaining consent in personal genome research. Genome Medicine. 6(12). 118–118. 13 indexed citations
17.
Kaye, Jane, et al.. (2013). CAN I ACCESS MY PERSONAL GENOME? THE CURRENT LEGAL POSITION IN THE UK. Medical Law Review. 22(1). 64–86. 13 indexed citations
18.
Kaye, Jane. (2012). Governing biobanks: understanding the interplay between law and practice. 18 indexed citations
19.
Kaye, Jane. (2006). Police collection and access to DNA samples. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 2(1). 8 indexed citations
20.
Helgason, Helgi H., et al.. (2005). Lessons from European Population Genetic Databases: Comparing the Law in Estonia, Iceland, Sweden and the United Kingdom. European Journal of Health Law. 12(2). 103–134. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026