Jantina de Vries
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 59
- Global Health and Surgery 9
- Biotechnology and Related Fields 9
- Genetics top 1%
- Genomics and Rare Diseases 23
- Race, Genetics, and Society 14
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer 9
- Health Informatics top 2%
- Physiology top 5%
- Biomedical Ethics and Regulation 31
- General Health Professions top 5%
-
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 9
- Co-authors
- Nchangwi Syntia MunungAlicia R. MartinHilary C. MartinTuuli LappalainenYukinori OkadaQin Qin HuangEmil UffelmannDaniëlle Posthuma
- Partner nations
- South AfricaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jantina de Vries
97 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 164
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.3k
- Genetics 1.2k
- Health Informatics 52
- Physiology 556
- General Health Professions 331
Countries citing papers authored by Jantina de Vries
This map shows the geographic impact of Jantina de Vries's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jantina de Vries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jantina de Vries more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jantina de Vries
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jantina de Vries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jantina de Vries. The network helps show where Jantina de Vries may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jantina de Vries, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 40 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 7 | Genome-wide association studiesbreakdown → | 2021 | 825 |
| 8 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 25 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 59 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 16 | RESEARCH ETHICS. Ethics review for international data-intensive research | 2016 | 7 |
| 17 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 45 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 52 |
About Jantina de Vries
Jantina de Vries is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics and Physiology, having authored 98 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (59 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (31 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (23 papers), Race, Genetics, and Society (14 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (9 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (9 papers), Global Health and Surgery (9 papers) and Biotechnology and Related Fields (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.3k citations), Genetics (1.2k citations) and Health Informatics (52 citations). Jantina de Vries has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nchangwi Syntia Munung, Alicia R. Martin, Hilary C. Martin, Tuuli Lappalainen, Yukinori Okada, Qin Qin Huang, Emil Uffelmann, Daniëlle Posthuma, Paulina Tindana and Jane Kaye. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Neuron and Nature Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.