Jane Nielsen

430 total citations
39 papers, 166 citations indexed

About

Jane Nielsen is a scholar working on Physiology, Management of Technology and Innovation and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Nielsen has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 166 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Physiology, 16 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation and 12 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Jane Nielsen's work include Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (17 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (16 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (6 papers). Jane Nielsen is often cited by papers focused on Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (17 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (16 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (6 papers). Jane Nielsen collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Jane Nielsen's co-authors include Dianne Nicol, Timothy Loher, Drc Chalmers, Lisa Eckstein, Cameron Stewart, Christine Critchley, John Liddicoat, Rebekah McWhirter, Margaret Otlowski and Tess Whitton and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, PLoS Biology and Human Genetics.

In The Last Decade

Jane Nielsen

30 papers receiving 145 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Nielsen Australia 7 50 46 33 31 29 39 166
Tess Whitton Australia 8 141 2.8× 15 0.3× 35 1.1× 9 0.3× 81 2.8× 11 250
Andelka M. Phillips United Kingdom 6 53 1.1× 6 0.1× 13 0.4× 14 0.5× 29 1.0× 16 187
Marsha W Fenner United States 2 43 0.9× 10 0.2× 6 0.2× 6 0.2× 93 3.2× 5 406
Henri‐Corto Stoeklé France 7 58 1.2× 8 0.2× 17 0.5× 2 0.1× 41 1.4× 24 172
Lori Knowles Canada 10 64 1.3× 34 0.7× 29 0.9× 1 0.0× 47 1.6× 18 228
Clémence Pinel Denmark 8 53 1.1× 3 0.1× 4 0.1× 7 0.2× 23 0.8× 15 186
Hendrik van den Belt Netherlands 7 7 0.1× 5 0.1× 7 0.2× 26 0.8× 2 0.1× 37 162
Carole McCartney United Kingdom 13 92 1.8× 4 0.1× 4 0.1× 12 0.4× 44 413
Daniela Gottschlich Germany 5 5 0.1× 4 0.1× 3 0.1× 35 1.1× 5 0.2× 11 112
Ann M. Mc Cartney United States 7 16 0.3× 5 0.2× 9 0.3× 5 0.2× 13 166

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Nielsen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Nielsen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Nielsen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Nielsen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Nielsen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Nielsen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Nielsen. The network helps show where Jane Nielsen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Nielsen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Nielsen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Nielsen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Nielsen. Jane Nielsen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nielsen, Jane & Dianne Nicol. (2024). Data ownership in genomic research consortia. Journal of Law and the Biosciences. 11(2). lsae024–lsae024. 1 indexed citations
2.
Nicol, Dianne, et al.. (2024). Data access arrangements in genomic research consortia. Scientific Reports. 14(1). 21685–21685. 1 indexed citations
3.
Scheibner, James, Jane Nielsen, & Dianne Nicol. (2022). An ethico-legal assessment of intellectual property rights and their effect on COVID-19 vaccine distribution: an Australian case study. Journal of Law and the Biosciences. 9(2). lsac020–lsac020. 3 indexed citations
4.
Nielsen, Jane, Lisa Eckstein, Dianne Nicol, & Cameron Stewart. (2021). Integrating Public Participation, Transparency and Accountability Into Governance of Marketing Authorisation for Genome Editing Products. Frontiers in Political Science. 3. 7 indexed citations
5.
McWhirter, Rebekah, Lisa Eckstein, Drc Chalmers, et al.. (2020). A Scenario-Based Methodology for Analyzing the Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in Genomic Data Sharing. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 15(4). 355–364. 3 indexed citations
6.
Nicol, Dianne, Drc Chalmers, Christine Critchley, et al.. (2020). Australian Perspectives on the Ethical and Regulatory Considerations for Responsible Data Sharing in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.. PubMed. 27(4). 829–838. 4 indexed citations
7.
Eckstein, Lisa, Drc Chalmers, Christine Critchley, et al.. (2018). Australia: regulating genomic data sharing to promote public trust. Human Genetics. 137(8). 583–591. 14 indexed citations
8.
Nielsen, Jane & Dianne Nicol. (2017). Patent law and the march of technology - did the productivity commission get it right?. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).
9.
Liddicoat, John, Jane Nielsen, & Dianne Nicol. (2016). Three dimensions of patent infringement: liability for creation and distribtion of CAD files. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations
10.
Liddicoat, John, Jane Nielsen, & Dianne Nicol. (2016). Three Dimensions of Patent Infringement: Liability for Creation and Distribution of CAD Files. Apollo (University of Cambridge). 2 indexed citations
11.
Nicol, Dianne, Jane Nielsen, John Liddicoat, Christine Critchley, & Tess Whitton. (2014). The Innovation Pool in Biotechnology: The Role of Patents in Facilitating Innovaiton. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations
12.
Nielsen, Jane, et al.. (2012). Compulsory Licensing of Patents. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 2 indexed citations
13.
Nielsen, Jane. (2011). Competition Law and Intellectual Property: Establishing a Coherent Approach. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).
14.
Nielsen, Jane. (2010). Biomedical innovation: How compulsory is competition?. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 38(2). 100–126.
15.
Nielsen, Jane. (2007). Innovation in medical biotechnology: Mapping the intersection of intellectual property and competition law. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations
16.
Nicol, Dianne & Jane Nielsen. (2005). Australian Medical Biotechnology: Navigating a Complex Patent Landscape. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 2 indexed citations
17.
Nicol, Dianne & Jane Nielsen. (2005). Gene patenting and human health: the ALRC's report on Genes and Ingenuity. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 20(10). 153–155.
18.
Nielsen, Jane. (2004). Reach-Through Rights in Biomedical Patent Licensing: A Comparative Analysis of their Anticompetitive Reach. Federal Law Review. 32(2). 169–204. 1 indexed citations
19.
Nielsen, Jane & Dianne Nicol. (2002). Pharmaceutical Patents and Developing Countries: The Conundrum of Access and Incentive. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations
20.
Nicol, Dianne & Jane Nielsen. (2001). The Australian Medical Biotechnology Industry and Access to Intellectual Property: Issues for Patent Law Development. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026