Tess Whitton

499 total citations
11 papers, 250 citations indexed

About

Tess Whitton is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology and Management of Technology and Innovation. According to data from OpenAlex, Tess Whitton has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 250 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 5 papers in Physiology and 3 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation. Recurrent topics in Tess Whitton's work include Ethics in Clinical Research (5 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (5 papers) and Intellectual Property and Patents (3 papers). Tess Whitton is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Clinical Research (5 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (5 papers) and Intellectual Property and Patents (3 papers). Tess Whitton collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Tess Whitton's co-authors include Dianne Nicol, Rebekah McWhirter, Christine Critchley, Drc Chalmers, Margaret Otlowski, Mark Taylor, Calvin Wai-Loon Ho, Colin Mitchell, Fruzsina Molnár‐Gábor and Jessica Bell and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Nature Biotechnology.

In The Last Decade

Tess Whitton

11 papers receiving 245 citations

Peers

Tess Whitton

PHEOH

PHYSI

MB

GENET

EE

Jusaku Minari Japan

Sirpa Soini Finland

David Magnus United States

Johannes Starkbaum Austria

Lori Knowles Canada

Jean E. McEwen United States

Erika Kleiderman Canada

Daniel B. Vorhaus United States

Ida Ngueng Feze Canada

Jasper Bovenberg Netherlands

Jusaku Minari Japan

Tess Whitton

171 ×1.2

PHEOH

110 ×1.4

PHYSI

57 ×0.9

MB

53 ×1.3

GENET

37 ×1.1

EE

Citations per year, relative to Tess Whitton Tess Whitton (= 1×) peers Jusaku Minari

Countries citing papers authored by Tess Whitton

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tess Whitton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tess Whitton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tess Whitton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tess Whitton

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tess Whitton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tess Whitton. The network helps show where Tess Whitton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tess Whitton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tess Whitton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tess Whitton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tess Whitton. Tess Whitton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Taylor, Mark & Tess Whitton. (2020). Public Interest, Health Research and Data Protection Law: Establishing a Legitimate Trade-Off between Individual Control and Research Access to Health Data. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(1). 6–6. 11 indexed citations

2.

Whitton, Tess, Jane Nielsen, & Dianne Nicol. (2019). Terms of Engagement: Transfer of Biological Materials for Research in Australia.. PubMed. 27(2). 338–354. 1 indexed citations

3.

Nielsen, Jane, Tania Bubela, Drc Chalmers, et al.. (2018). Provenance and risk in transfer of biological materials. PLoS Biology. 16(8). e2006031–e2006031. 12 indexed citations

4.

Chalmers, Drc, Dianne Nicol, Jane Kaye, et al.. (2016). Has the biobank bubble burst? Withstanding the challenges for sustainable biobanking in the digital era. BMC Medical Ethics. 17(1). 39–39. 84 indexed citations

5.

Nicol, Dianne, Christine Critchley, Rebekah McWhirter, & Tess Whitton. (2016). Understanding public reactions to commercialization of biobanks and use of biobank resources. Social Science & Medicine. 162. 79–87. 42 indexed citations

6.

Liddicoat, John, Tess Whitton, & Dianne Nicol. (2015). Are the gene-patent storm clouds dissipating? A global snapshot. Nature Biotechnology. 33(4). 347–352. 9 indexed citations

7.

Nicol, Dianne, Jane Nielsen, John Liddicoat, Christine Critchley, & Tess Whitton. (2014). The Innovation Pool in Biotechnology: The Role of Patents in Facilitating Innovaiton. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations

8.

McWhirter, Rebekah, Christine Critchley, Dianne Nicol, et al.. (2014). Community Engagement for Big Epidemiology: Deliberative Democracy as a Tool. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 4(4). 459–474. 31 indexed citations

9.

Nielsen, Jane, Dianne Nicol, John Liddicoat, & Tess Whitton. (2014). Another Missed Opportunity to Reform Compulsory Licensing and Crown Use in Australia. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

10.

Chalmers, Drc, Rebekah McWhirter, Dianne Nicol, et al.. (2014). New avenues within community engagement: addressing the ingenuity gap in our approach to health research and future provision of health care. Journal of Responsible Innovation. 1(3). 321–328. 11 indexed citations

11.

Munroe, David J., Tess Whitton, Dirk Prawitt, et al.. (1995). Systematic screening of an arrayed cDNA library by PCR.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 92(6). 2209–2213. 44 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact