Countries citing papers authored by Dominique Fleury
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Dominique Fleury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dominique Fleury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dominique Fleury more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dominique Fleury
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dominique Fleury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dominique Fleury. The network helps show where Dominique Fleury may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dominique Fleury
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dominique Fleury.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dominique Fleury based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Dominique Fleury. Dominique Fleury is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fleury, Dominique, et al.. (2019). Influence du réchauffement climatique sur la dynamique des populations de Scaphoideus titanus en Romandie. Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva).2 indexed citations
2.
Fleury, Dominique, et al.. (2017). Effets de contact de quatre insecticides sur les punaises phytophages "Halyomorpha halys" et "Nezara viridula". Revue suisse de viticulture, arboriculture et horticulture. 49(3). 188–193.1 indexed citations
3.
Speight, Martin C.D., et al.. (2017). Hoverfly diversity supported by vineyards and the importance of ground cover management. ArODES (HES-SO (https://www.hes-so.ch/)).8 indexed citations
4.
Fleury, Dominique, et al.. (2016). Evaluation des populations de coccinelles asiatiques en viticulture intégrée ou biologique. ArODES (HES-SO (https://www.hes-so.ch/)). 48(2). 124–129.2 indexed citations
5.
Lefort, François, et al.. (2014). Pathogenicity of entomopathogenic fungi to the green peach aphid Myzus persicae Sulzer (Aphididae) and the European tarnished bug Lygus rugulipennis Poppius (Miridae).. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control. 24(2). 379–386.5 indexed citations
Wang, Min, et al.. (2010). Maturité du Luizet et qualité des eaux-de-vie d'abricots. Revue suisse de viticulture, arboriculture et horticulture. 42(6). 342–349.
Corazza, Maria Vittoria, et al.. (2002). Cost Action C6 - Final Report : A city for pedestrians, policy-making and implementation. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
15.
Fleury, Dominique & Thierry Brenac. (2001). PROTOTYPICAL SCENARIOS, A TOOL FOR ROAD SAFETY RESEARCH AND DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 33(2).
Fleury, Dominique, et al.. (1990). National and local road safety policies in France - conditions and perspectives. IATSS Research. 14(2). 16–24.1 indexed citations
19.
Fleury, Dominique. (1990). Accident analysis methods and research prospects. IATSS Research. 14(1). 43–49.1 indexed citations
20.
Fleury, Dominique, et al.. (1988). ANALYSE TYPOLOGIQUE DES MANOEUVRES D'URGENCE EN INTERSECTION.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.