Diane N. Ruble
- Social Psychology top 0.2%
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Education top 0.2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.5%
- Gender Studies top 0.05%
- Co-authors
- Carol Lynn MartinJeanne Brooks‐GunnNina S. FeldmanE. Tory HigginsW. Steven RholesCharles StangorKarin S. FreyAnn K. Boggiano
- Topics
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies (46 papers)Early Childhood Education and Development (45 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (24 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Diane N. Ruble
160 papers receiving 9.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
- Social Psychology 3.6k
- Clinical Psychology 2.7k
- Education 2.7k
- Sociology and Political Science 2.6k
- Gender Studies 2.5k
Countries citing papers authored by Diane N. Ruble
This map shows the geographic impact of Diane N. Ruble's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane N. Ruble with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane N. Ruble more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diane N. Ruble
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane N. Ruble. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane N. Ruble. The network helps show where Diane N. Ruble may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diane N. Ruble
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diane N. Ruble. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diane N. Ruble based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diane N. Ruble. Diane N. Ruble is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | |
| 2 | 45 | |
| 3 | 79 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 424 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 130 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 76 | |
| 13 | 37 | |
| 14 | Social cognition and social development : a sociocultural perspectivebreakdown → | 431 |
| 15 | 259 | |
| 16 | 81 | |
| 17 | 170 | |
| 18 | 55 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Diane N. Ruble
Diane N. Ruble is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Education, having authored 165 papers that have together received 10.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Roles and Identity Studies (46 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (45 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (2.5k citations), Social Psychology (3.6k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.8k citations). Diane N. Ruble has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Carol Lynn Martin, Jeanne Brooks‐Gunn, Nina S. Feldman, E. Tory Higgins, W. Steven Rholes, Charles Stangor, Karin S. Frey, Ann K. Boggiano, Jacquelynne E. Parsons and Kristina M. Zosuls. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Psychological Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.