Devon N. Gangi
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Genetics
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Daniel S. MessingerSally OzonoffLisa V. IbañezMonique Moore HillMeghan MillerA. J. SchwichtenbergWhitney I. MattsonAna‐Maria Iosif
- Topics
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (14 papers)Child Development and Digital Technology (9 papers)Family and Disability Support Research (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEChild Development
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgiumIsrael
In The Last Decade
Devon N. Gangi
19 papers receiving 287 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Cognitive Neuroscience 214
- Education 97
- Clinical Psychology 72
- Genetics 69
- Psychiatry and Mental health 48
Countries citing papers authored by Devon N. Gangi
This map shows the geographic impact of Devon N. Gangi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Devon N. Gangi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Devon N. Gangi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Devon N. Gangi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Devon N. Gangi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Devon N. Gangi. The network helps show where Devon N. Gangi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Devon N. Gangi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Devon N. Gangi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Devon N. Gangi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Devon N. Gangi. Devon N. Gangi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 34 | |
| 9 | Use of Prospective Longitudinal Gaze Measurements in Defining Regression | 1 |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 57 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | Nonverbal expressions of positive emotions | 9 |
| 18 | 49 | |
| 19 | 24 | |
| 20 | 24 |
About Devon N. Gangi
Devon N. Gangi is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Education, having authored 21 papers that have together received 299 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (14 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (9 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (214 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (45 citations) and Clinical Psychology (72 citations). Devon N. Gangi has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Daniel S. Messinger, Sally Ozonoff, Lisa V. Ibañez, Monique Moore Hill, Meghan Miller, A. J. Schwichtenberg, Whitney I. Mattson, Ana‐Maria Iosif, Gregory S. Young and Alesha Hill. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Child Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.