Countries citing papers authored by Denis P. Doyle
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Denis P. Doyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denis P. Doyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denis P. Doyle more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denis P. Doyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denis P. Doyle. The network helps show where Denis P. Doyle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denis P. Doyle
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denis P. Doyle.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denis P. Doyle based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Denis P. Doyle. Denis P. Doyle is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Doyle, Denis P.. (2003). Data-Driven Decision-Making: Is It the Mantra of the Month or Does It Have Staying Power?. T.H.E. Journal Technological Horizons in Education. 30(10). 53p–14p.4 indexed citations
3.
Murphy, John & Denis P. Doyle. (1998). Standards Set: So What Now?.. The School Administrator. 55(3). 24–27.1 indexed citations
4.
Doyle, Denis P.. (1997). Vouchers for Religious Schools.. The Public interest.1 indexed citations
5.
Doyle, Denis P.. (1997). Education and Character: A Conservative View.. Phi Delta Kappan. 78(6). 440.21 indexed citations
6.
Doyle, Denis P.. (1994). The Role of Private Sector Management in Public Education.. Phi Delta Kappan. 76(2). 128.9 indexed citations
7.
Doyle, Denis P., et al.. (1993). A Study in Change: Transforming the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools.. Phi Delta Kappan. 74(7). 534.3 indexed citations
8.
Doyle, Denis P.. (1993). American Schools: Good, Bad, or Indifferent?. Phi Delta Kappan. 74(8). 626.1 indexed citations
9.
Doyle, Denis P.. (1992). The White House and the School House.. Phi Delta Kappan. 74(2). 129.
10.
Doyle, Denis P.. (1992). The Challenge, the Opportunity.. Phi Delta Kappan. 73(7).8 indexed citations
11.
Doyle, Denis P.. (1989). Here's Why School Choice Will Boost Student Motivation and Learning.. The American school board journal. 176(7). 25–28.1 indexed citations
Doyle, Denis P. & Chester E. Finn. (1985). Now Is the Time for the Year-Round School.. Principal. 65(1). 29–31.4 indexed citations
14.
Doyle, Denis P. & Marsha Levine. (1985). Business and the Public Schools: Observations on the Policy Statement of the Committee for Economic Development.. Phi Delta Kappan. 67(2).5 indexed citations
15.
Doyle, Denis P., et al.. (1985). Leadership in Education: Governors, Legislators, and Teachers.. Phi Delta Kappan. 67(1). 21–27.2 indexed citations
16.
Doyle, Denis P. & Chester E. Finn. (1984). American Schools and the Future of Local Control.. The Public interest.15 indexed citations
17.
Doyle, Denis P. & Marsha Levine. (1984). Magnet Schools: Choice and Quality in Public Education.. Phi Delta Kappan. 66(4).11 indexed citations
18.
Doyle, Denis P. & Bruce S. Cooper. (1983). Is Excellence Possible in Urban Public Schools. American education. 19(9). 16–26.1 indexed citations
Doyle, Denis P.. (1980). Public Policy and Private Education.. Phi Delta Kappan. 62(1). 16–19.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.