Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Cultural Diversity at Work: The Effects of Diversity Perspectives on Work Group Processes and Outcomes
Countries citing papers authored by David A. Thomas
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of David A. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David A. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David A. Thomas more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David A. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David A. Thomas. The network helps show where David A. Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David A. Thomas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David A. Thomas.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David A. Thomas based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David A. Thomas. David A. Thomas is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Thomas, David A. & A. Hunt. (2020). The pragmatic programmer : your journey to mastery. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).15 indexed citations
Lowenthal, Patrick R. & David A. Thomas. (2010). Death to the Digital Dropbox: Rethinking Student Privacy and Public Performance. The EDUCAUSE quarterly/EDUCAUSE quarterly. 33(3).9 indexed citations
Thomas, David A.. (2004). How Educators Can More Effectively Understand and Combat the Plagiarism Epidemic. Brigham Young University education and law journal. 2004(2). 421–430.9 indexed citations
9.
Thomas, David A.. (2003). The Law School Rankings are Harmful Deceptions: A Response to Those Who Praise the Rankings and Suggestions for a Better Approach to Evaluating Law Schools. Houston Law Review. 40(2). 4844.1 indexed citations
10.
Thomas, David A.. (2001). American Legal Education: Moving from the Classroom Without Paper to Instruction Without the Classroom?. Journal of information, law and technology. 2001.1 indexed citations
11.
Thomas, David A., et al.. (1997). A Question of Color: A Debate on Race in the U.S. Workplace.. Harvard business review. 75(5). 118–132.21 indexed citations
12.
Thomas, David A.. (1997). Sentencing Referencer 2002. Medical Entomology and Zoology.
13.
Thomas, David A., et al.. (1996). Integrated mathematics, science, and technology: an introduction to scientific visualization. 15(3). 267–294.7 indexed citations
14.
Thomas, David A.. (1992). Using computer visualization to motivate and support mathematical dialogues. 11(3). 265–274.1 indexed citations
15.
Thomas, David A.. (1990). Give meaning to matrices with MATLAB. 9(3). 73–85.1 indexed citations
16.
Thomas, David A.. (1989). Investigating Fractal Geometry Using LOGO. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching. 8(3). 25–31.3 indexed citations
Thomas, David A.. (1986). Origins of the Common Law (A Three-part Series) Part ITI: Common Law Under the Early Normans. Brigham Young University law review. 1986(1). 109–126.1 indexed citations
19.
Thomas, David A. & Jack Hart. (1983). Ethics in Speech Events: A Replication and Extension.. 1(2). 75–95.5 indexed citations
20.
Thomas, David A.. (1983). The Ethics of Proof in Speech Events: A Survey of Standards Used by Contestants and Judges.. 1(1). 1–17.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.