Debra Harker

709 total citations
45 papers, 498 citations indexed

About

Debra Harker is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Marketing and Accounting. According to data from OpenAlex, Debra Harker has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 498 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Strategy and Management, 16 papers in Marketing and 15 papers in Accounting. Recurrent topics in Debra Harker's work include Business Law and Ethics (14 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (9 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (8 papers). Debra Harker is often cited by papers focused on Business Law and Ethics (14 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (9 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (8 papers). Debra Harker collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Germany and United States. Debra Harker's co-authors include Michael Harker, Bishnu Sharma, Maria Raciti, Robert C. Burns, Rebecca O’Hara, Peter Slade, Peter J. Graham, Greg W. Marshall and Chad Perry and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Business Research, Journal of Consumer Marketing and International Marketing Review.

In The Last Decade

Debra Harker

44 papers receiving 413 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Debra Harker Australia 16 197 114 81 69 63 45 498
Pauline M. Ippolito United States 14 344 1.7× 67 0.6× 132 1.6× 245 3.6× 49 0.8× 24 798
Susan Gregory United States 12 152 0.8× 210 1.8× 27 0.3× 34 0.5× 172 2.7× 31 579
Sarah Dodds New Zealand 12 240 1.2× 210 1.8× 33 0.4× 25 0.4× 94 1.5× 26 579
Lawrence R. Lepisto United States 11 147 0.7× 126 1.1× 48 0.6× 43 0.6× 143 2.3× 21 523
Thomas Boysen Anker United Kingdom 12 137 0.7× 118 1.0× 36 0.4× 30 0.4× 90 1.4× 22 367
Annetta M. Gibson United States 4 94 0.5× 170 1.5× 125 1.5× 10 0.1× 138 2.2× 9 653
Stephan Vom Dahl United Kingdom 14 127 0.6× 187 1.6× 27 0.3× 34 0.5× 37 0.6× 29 454
Kenny K. Chan United States 9 175 0.9× 222 1.9× 20 0.2× 98 1.4× 65 1.0× 15 523
Jill K. Maher United States 13 124 0.6× 136 1.2× 28 0.3× 52 0.8× 60 1.0× 23 397
Paul Harrison Australia 8 96 0.5× 150 1.3× 29 0.4× 56 0.8× 146 2.3× 22 399

Countries citing papers authored by Debra Harker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Debra Harker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra Harker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra Harker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Debra Harker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra Harker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra Harker. The network helps show where Debra Harker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Debra Harker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Debra Harker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Debra Harker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Debra Harker. Debra Harker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sharma, Bishnu, et al.. (2010). Youth transition to university in Germany and Australia: an empirical investigation of healthy eating behaviour. Journal of Youth Studies. 13(3). 353–367. 17 indexed citations
2.
Harker, Michael, Debra Harker, & Robert C. Burns. (2008). Optimizing Marketing Intervention Strategies in the Obesogenic Environment: REACH FAR, the Eight Criteria for Program Planners. Health Marketing Quarterly. 25(4). 329–343. 2 indexed citations
3.
Raciti, Maria, et al.. (2008). Young adults' food motives: an Australian social marketing perspective. Young Consumers Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers. 9(1). 17–28. 20 indexed citations
4.
O’Hara, Rebecca, Debra Harker, Maria Raciti, & Michael Harker. (2008). Attitudinal, normative and demographic influences on female students' alcohol consumption. Young Consumers Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers. 9(1). 7–16. 16 indexed citations
5.
Raciti, Maria, et al.. (2008). The Influence of Residence on Young Adult Attitudes toward Healthy Eating. Social Marketing Quarterly. 14(2). 33–49. 8 indexed citations
6.
Harker, Debra & Chad Perry. (2007). Accelerating Learning in Marketing Education Using Teams: Principles and Practice. USC Research Bank (University of the Sunshine Coast). 1(1). 1. 2 indexed citations
7.
Harker, Michael & Debra Harker. (2007). Direct‐to‐consumer‐advertising of prescription medicines. Leadership in health services. 20(2). 76–84. 15 indexed citations
8.
Harker, Debra, et al.. (2007). Achieving Deep Learning with Student Teamwork: An Exploratory Investigation. USC Research Bank (University of the Sunshine Coast). 1(1). 24. 2 indexed citations
9.
Harker, Michael, et al.. (2006). People Who Complain about Advertising: The Aficionados, Guardians, Activists and Seekers. Journal of Marketing Management. 22(3-4). 379–405. 4 indexed citations
10.
Harker, Debra, et al.. (2005). Who's complaining? Using MOSAIC to identify the profile of complainants. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. 23(3). 296–312. 19 indexed citations
11.
Harker, Debra. (2004). Educating to Improve the Effectiveness of Advertising Self-Regulatory Schemes: The Case of Australia. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising. 26(1). 69–84. 6 indexed citations
12.
Harker, Debra & Michael Harker. (2002). Dealing with complaints about advertising in Australia: the importance of regulatory self-discipline. International Journal of Advertising. 21(1). 23–45. 11 indexed citations
13.
Harker, Debra, et al.. (2002). Mobile Data Technology for Small Businesses: needs, uses and adoption. AJIS. Australasian journal of information systems/AJIS. Australian journal of information systems/Australian journal of information systems. 9(2). 5 indexed citations
14.
Harker, Debra, et al.. (2002). Mobile Data Technologies and SME Adoption and Diffusion: an empirical study of barriers and facillitators. AJIS. Australasian journal of information systems/AJIS. Australian journal of information systems/Australian journal of information systems. 9(2). 8 indexed citations
15.
Harker, Debra, et al.. (2002). Complaint behaviour: a study of the differences between complainants about advertising in Australia and the population at large. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 19(4). 319–332. 29 indexed citations
16.
Harker, Debra. (2000). Complaints about advertising: what’s really happening?. Qualitative Market Research An International Journal. 3(4). 198–206. 16 indexed citations
17.
Harker, Debra & Peter J. Graham. (1999). Effective Advertising Self-Regulation. Policy and Society. 18(1). 59–74. 3 indexed citations
18.
Harker, Debra. (1998). Achieving acceptable advertising. International Marketing Review. 15(2). 101–118. 44 indexed citations
19.
Marshall, Greg W., Michael Harker, & Debra Harker. (1998). Selling and Sales Management in Action: The Role of Strategic Selling in the Company Turnaround Process. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 18(2). 55–67. 7 indexed citations
20.
Harker, Debra. (1997). Regulating Advertising in New Zealand and Australia: Learning from Failure and Success. Policy and Society. 14(1). 57–81. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Pauline M. Ippolito Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Susan Gregory Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sarah Dodds Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lawrence R. Lepisto Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Thomas Boysen Anker Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Annetta M. Gibson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stephan Vom Dahl Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kenny K. Chan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jill K. Maher Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Paul Harrison
Rankless by CCL
2026