Deborah Osberg
- Education top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Human Factors and Ergonomics top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Co-authors
- Gert BiestaPaul CilliersWilliam E. Doll
- Topics
- Education and Critical Thinking Development (3 papers)Chaos, Complexity, and Education (3 papers)Critical Theory and Philosophy (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Curriculum StudiesInternational Journal of Inclusive EducationEducational Philosophy and Theory
- Partner nations
- United KingdomLuxembourgUnited States
In The Last Decade
Deborah Osberg
18 papers receiving 440 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Education 283
- Sociology and Political Science 140
- Political Science and International Relations 80
- Human Factors and Ergonomics 58
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 55
Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Osberg
This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Osberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Osberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Osberg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Osberg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Osberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Osberg. The network helps show where Deborah Osberg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah Osberg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah Osberg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah Osberg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah Osberg. Deborah Osberg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 42 | |
| 2 | 48 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 79 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 88 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 90 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | Rethinking Schooling Through the “Logic” of Emergence: Some thoughts on planned enculturation and educational responsibility | 3 |
| 14 | 66 | |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | Complexity, science and adult education: some insights and possibilities | 1 |
| 18 | 2 |
About Deborah Osberg
Deborah Osberg is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, Philosophy and Education, having authored 18 papers that have together received 506 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Education and Critical Thinking Development (3 papers), Chaos, Complexity, and Education (3 papers) and Critical Theory and Philosophy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human Factors and Ergonomics (58 citations), Education (283 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (55 citations). Deborah Osberg has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Luxembourg and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gert Biesta, Paul Cilliers and William E. Doll. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Curriculum Studies, International Journal of Inclusive Education and Educational Philosophy and Theory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.