Dean Pierides

15 papers receiving 652 citations

Hit Papers

From Data to Causes I: Building A General Cross-Lagged Pa...2019202620212023201950100150200

Peers

Dean Pierides
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Sociology and Political Science 185
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 145
  • Social Psychology 97
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 93
  • Education 85
Replace Jingzhou Pan with:
Jingzhou Pan China
Michael J. Roszkowski United States
Brent J. Lyons Canada
Anees Janee Ali Malaysia
Neharika Vohra India
Renu Rastogi India
John Fiset Canada
Tracy Kantrowitz United States
Jacqueline Z. Bergman United States
Jyoti Verma India
Dean Pierides relative to Jingzhou Pan China Jingzhou Pan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Jingzhou Pan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dean Pierides

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dean Pierides's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dean Pierides with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dean Pierides more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dean Pierides

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dean Pierides. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dean Pierides. The network helps show where Dean Pierides may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dean Pierides

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dean Pierides. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dean Pierides based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dean Pierides. Dean Pierides is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 0
3 11
4 12
5
A Day at a Time: a research agenda to grasp the everyday experience of time in the COVID-19 pandemic
2
6 80
7 18
8
From Data to Causes I: Building A General Cross-Lagged Panel Model (GCLM)breakdown →
208
9 8
10 24
11 0
12 31
13 77
14 141
15 27
16 33
17
Narratives that nudge: Raising theoretical questions about reflective practice
3
18
From profiles to rich tasks : authenticity in curriculum and assessment practices in Australia
1

About Dean Pierides

Dean Pierides is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, History and Philosophy of Science and Health, having authored 18 papers that have together received 677 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (145 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (93 citations) and Health (53 citations). Dean Pierides has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Zyphur, Jon Roffe, Louis Tay, Kristopher J. Preacher, Paul D. Allison, Manuel C. Voelkle, Peter Koval, Ellen L. Hamaker, Zhen Zhang and Ed Diener. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Journal of Business Ethics and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026