David Reed

4.7k citations
132 papers · 3.6k indexed · h-index 32

David Reed

129 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

David Reed
Comparison fields: 5 of 183
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 182
  • General Health Professions 1.4k
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 170
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 83
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 623
Replace Inger K. Holmström with:
Inger K. Holmström Sweden
Mike Thomas United Kingdom
John R. Hurst United Kingdom
Timothy R. Dresselhaus United States
Diana Lee Hong Kong
Graeme Rocker Canada
Laura M. Wagner United States
William C. Bailey United States
Étienne V Langlois Switzerland
David Richards United Kingdom
David Reed relative to Inger K. Holmström Sweden Inger K. Holmström's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Inger K. Holmström · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Reed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Reed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Reed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Reed. The network helps show where David Reed may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Reed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Reed Line = papers co-authored together David Reed links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 201735
3 201427
4 201429
5 201418
6 20137
7 20113
8 201140
9 20107
10 20104
11 200723
12 200747
13 200535
14 200310
15 200038
16 200064
17 1997104
18
ANSI/ANS-8. 3-1986: American National Standard criticality accident alarm system
19911
19 199124
20 19841

About David Reed

David Reed is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, General Health Professions, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Health Information Management and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 132 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (35 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (20 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (16 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (11 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (10 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (9 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (9 papers) and Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (182 citations), General Health Professions (1.4k citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (170 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (83 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (623 citations). David Reed has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Gert Ehrlich, Sheryl Zimmerman, Philip D. Sloane, Kathleen C. Buckwalter, Lauren W. Cohen, Meridean Maas, Brenda M. Booth, Karen M. Robinson, Anna Beeber and Daniel W. Russell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, Surface Science, Health Services Research and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026