Diana Lee

194 papers receiving 5.3k citations

Peers

Diana Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 181
  • Research and Theory 56
  • Family Practice 100
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 168
  • General Health Professions 874
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 119
Replace Shirley M. Moore with:
Shirley M. Moore United States
Kai Chow Choi Hong Kong
C.A.C. Prinsen Netherlands
Jane Phillips Australia
David E. Kern United States
Charles W. Given United States
V F Hillier United Kingdom
Sally Wai‐Chi Chan Australia
Theo van Achterberg Netherlands
Christopher J. Burant United States
Diana Lee relative to Shirley M. Moore United States Shirley M. Moore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Shirley M. Moore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diana Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Lee. The network helps show where Diana Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diana Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Diana Lee Line = papers co-authored together Diana Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 202 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004183
2 2010173
3 2004172
4 2004155
5 2002153
6 2008150
7 2005149
8 2000130
9 2008112
10 200593
11 201293
12 200987
13 201883
14 201778
15 200275
16 200775
17 200470
18 201069
19 196969
20 201167

About Diana Lee

Diana Lee is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology, having authored 202 papers that have together received 5.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (19 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (14 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (11 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (9 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (9 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (7 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (7 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (56 citations), Family Practice (100 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (168 citations), General Health Professions (874 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (119 citations). Diana Lee has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jean Woo, Doris Sau Fung Yu, David R. Thompson, Ann Mackenzie, Karis Kin Fong Cheng, Sek Ying Chair, Janita Pak Chun Chau, Sarah Kong, Iris Lee and Doris S.F. Yu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Clinical Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Clinical Interventions in Aging and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact