Janet Specht

1.5k total citations
49 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Janet Specht is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, Janet Specht has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in General Health Professions, 11 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 8 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in Janet Specht's work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (17 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (11 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (7 papers). Janet Specht is often cited by papers focused on Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (17 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (11 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (7 papers). Janet Specht collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Janet Specht's co-authors include Meridean Maas, H. Rebel, R. Löhken, G. Hauser, G. Schatz, G.W. Schweimer, Lisa Skemp Kelley, Myonghwa Park, Kathleen C. Buckwalter and H. Klewe‐Nebenius and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics Letters B and Nuclear Physics A.

In The Last Decade

Janet Specht

47 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Janet Specht United States 19 467 441 211 196 179 49 1.2k
A. S. Rosenthal United States 17 389 0.8× 580 1.3× 135 0.6× 918 4.7× 151 0.8× 34 2.2k
Anders Nordlund Sweden 18 201 0.4× 133 0.3× 109 0.5× 140 0.7× 45 0.3× 65 1.2k
Peter Stoltz United States 19 294 0.6× 155 0.4× 311 1.5× 55 0.3× 110 0.6× 107 1.1k
Paul A. Bradley United States 34 782 1.7× 452 1.0× 372 1.8× 294 1.5× 49 0.3× 219 4.8k
Richard R. Ries United States 12 79 0.2× 581 1.3× 48 0.2× 356 1.8× 84 0.5× 13 2.4k
G. Ilie Canada 21 233 0.5× 146 0.3× 123 0.6× 76 0.4× 90 0.5× 95 1.4k
Robert John United States 22 45 0.1× 198 0.4× 697 3.3× 57 0.3× 211 1.2× 67 2.1k
L. Ray United States 31 2.4k 5.1× 185 0.4× 1.0k 4.7× 97 0.5× 29 0.2× 85 3.6k
T. J. Morgan United States 35 117 0.3× 381 0.9× 1.3k 6.3× 90 0.5× 40 0.2× 152 3.6k
Anne E. Ray United States 27 543 1.2× 431 1.0× 292 1.4× 33 0.2× 118 0.7× 72 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Specht

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Specht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Specht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Specht more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Specht

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Specht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Specht. The network helps show where Janet Specht may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Specht

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Specht. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Specht based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Specht. Janet Specht is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Specht, Janet, et al.. (2023). Value and effects of adopting residential flexibility in the European power system. 1–5. 1 indexed citations
2.
Scherb, Cindy A., et al.. (2016). Staff Nurse Decisional Involvement in the United States and Turkey. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 39(12). 1589–1605. 5 indexed citations
3.
Specht, Janet & D. F. Mahoney. (2015). DIGNITY AND MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT. The Gerontologist. 55(Suppl_2). 145–145.
4.
Rose, Karen, et al.. (2014). Correlates Among Nocturnal Agitation, Sleep, and Urinary Incontinence in Dementia. American Journal of Alzheimer s Disease & Other Dementias®. 30(1). 78–84. 12 indexed citations
5.
Sanders, Sara, Mercedes Bern‐Klug, Janet Specht, Paula R. Mobily, & Ann Bossen. (2012). Expanding the Role of Long-Term Care Social Workers: Assessment and Intervention Related to Urinary Incontinence. Journal of Gerontological Social Work. 55(3). 262–281. 4 indexed citations
6.
Williams, Janet K., Lioness Ayres, Janet Specht, Kathleen J.H. Sparbel, & Mary Lou Klimek. (2009). Caregiving by Teens for Family Members With Huntington Disease. Journal of Family Nursing. 15(3). 273–294. 46 indexed citations
7.
Scherb, Cindy A., et al.. (2009). The Relationship Between RN Job Satisfaction and Accountability. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 31(7). 872–888. 20 indexed citations
8.
Salsbury, Stacie A., et al.. (2008). Everyday Excellence: A Framework for Professional Nursing Practice in Long-Term Care. Research in Gerontological Nursing. 1(3). 217–228. 2 indexed citations
9.
Maas, Meridean, et al.. (2008). Nursing Home Staffing and Training Recommendations for Promoting Older Adults’ Quality of Care and Life: Part 2. Increasing Nurse Staffing and Training. Research in Gerontological Nursing. 1(2). 134–152. 25 indexed citations
11.
Harvath, Theresa A., Cornelia Beck, Marna Flaherty‐Robb, et al.. (2006). Best practice initiatives in geriatric nursing: Experiences from the John A. Hartford Foundation Centers of Geriatric Nursing Excellence. Nursing Outlook. 54(4). 212–218. 5 indexed citations
12.
Pearson, Kristina K., et al.. (2006). Perceptions and Characteristics of Registered Nursesʼ Involvement in Decision Making. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 30(3). 266–272. 24 indexed citations
13.
Smith, Marianne, Janet Specht, & Kathleen C. Buckwalter. (2004). GEROPSYCHIATRIC INPATIENT CARE: WHAT IS STATE OF THE ART?. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 26(1). 11–22. 10 indexed citations
14.
Maas, Meridean, David Reed, Myonghwa Park, et al.. (2004). Outcomes of Family Involvement in Care Intervention for Caregivers of Individuals With Dementia. Nursing Research. 53(2). 76–86. 132 indexed citations
15.
Specht, Janet & Paula R. Mobily. (2004). THE YOUNG GERONTOLOGICAL NURSE CLINICIAN PROGRAM: AN INNOVATIVE GEROPSYCHIATRIC NURSING RECRUITMENT STRATEGY. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 26(1). 81–90. 9 indexed citations
16.
Herr, Keela, et al.. (2000). Reliability of Nursing Diagnoses Documented in a Computerized Nursing Information System. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 11(3). 121–134. 11 indexed citations
17.
Specht, Janet, et al.. (2000). Whoʼs the Boss? Family/Staff Partnership in Care of Persons with Dementia. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 24(3). 64–77. 38 indexed citations
18.
Maas, Meridean, Janet Specht, Kay Weiler, Kathleen C. Buckwalter, & Bridget Turner. (1998). Special Care Units for People With ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE: Only for the Privileged Few?. Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 24(3). 28–37. 15 indexed citations
19.
Specht, Janet. (1985). DRGs: An Opportunity for the Gerontological Nurse to Move Forward!. Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 11(4). 6–6. 1 indexed citations
20.
Specht, Janet, G.W. Schweimer, H. Rebel, et al.. (1971). Evidence for oblate shape of 12C from inelastic α-particle scattering. Nuclear Physics A. 171(1). 65–72. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026