Mary T. Champagne

3.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
51 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Mary T. Champagne is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Emergency Medical Services. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary T. Champagne has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in General Health Professions, 11 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects and 6 papers in Emergency Medical Services. Recurrent topics in Mary T. Champagne's work include Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (10 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (9 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (5 papers). Mary T. Champagne is often cited by papers focused on Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (10 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (9 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (5 papers). Mary T. Champagne collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Sudan and Zambia. Mary T. Champagne's co-authors include Sandra G. Funk, Elizabeth M. Tornquist, Barbara Braden, Elizabeth Ruby, Nancy Bergstrom, Mildred G. Kemp, Virginia J. Neelon, John R. Carlson, Deirdre K. Thornlow and Jane Blood‐Siegfried and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Academic Medicine and The Gerontologist.

In The Last Decade

Mary T. Champagne

49 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Hit Papers

Barriers: The barriers to research utilization scale 1991 2026 2002 2014 1991 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mary T. Champagne United States 18 1.5k 696 496 495 427 51 2.5k
José Miguel Morales‐Asencio Spain 32 1.1k 0.8× 393 0.6× 212 0.4× 550 1.1× 57 0.1× 228 3.4k
Charmaine Kleiber United States 25 542 0.4× 232 0.3× 84 0.2× 330 0.7× 88 0.2× 66 2.5k
Christa Lohrmann Austria 28 850 0.6× 133 0.2× 458 0.9× 361 0.7× 28 0.1× 127 2.4k
Fiona Coyer Australia 31 444 0.3× 104 0.1× 1.7k 3.4× 538 1.1× 27 0.1× 181 3.4k
Ania Willman Sweden 25 754 0.5× 204 0.3× 96 0.2× 386 0.8× 41 0.1× 75 1.6k
Rick Wiechula Australia 19 616 0.4× 108 0.2× 66 0.1× 335 0.7× 90 0.2× 64 1.4k
Ewa Idvall Sweden 31 649 0.4× 109 0.2× 405 0.8× 322 0.7× 8 0.0× 105 2.5k
Lena Gunningberg Sweden 36 634 0.4× 252 0.4× 2.0k 4.1× 297 0.6× 10 0.0× 91 3.4k
Susanne Bernhardsson Sweden 22 1.0k 0.7× 63 0.1× 138 0.3× 509 1.0× 50 0.1× 65 2.2k
Karin Wikblad Sweden 30 839 0.6× 112 0.2× 41 0.1× 490 1.0× 17 0.0× 79 2.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Mary T. Champagne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary T. Champagne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary T. Champagne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary T. Champagne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary T. Champagne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary T. Champagne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary T. Champagne. The network helps show where Mary T. Champagne may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary T. Champagne

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary T. Champagne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary T. Champagne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary T. Champagne. Mary T. Champagne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Turner, Barbara, et al.. (2017). High-Dose Interleukin-2: Evaluation of a Standardized Order Set for Biotherapy in an Intensive Care Unit. Clinical journal of oncology nursing. 21(2). E49–E53. 1 indexed citations
2.
Champagne, Mary T., et al.. (2016). Operating Room Delays. CIN Computers Informatics Nursing. 34(6). 247–253. 3 indexed citations
3.
Champagne, Mary T., et al.. (2016). Intrahospital Transport of the Critically Ill Adult. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing. 35(3). 133–146. 17 indexed citations
4.
Blood‐Siegfried, Jane, et al.. (2015). Coalition Building for Health: A Community Garden Pilot Project with Apartment Dwelling Refugees. Journal of Community Health Nursing. 32(3). 141–150. 27 indexed citations
5.
Thompson, Julie, et al.. (2014). Implementing Evidence-Based Medication Safety Interventions on a Progressive Care Unit. AJN American Journal of Nursing. 114(11). 53–62. 13 indexed citations
6.
Granger, Bradi B., et al.. (2013). The Language of Data. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development. 29(6). 294–300. 2 indexed citations
7.
McCallum, Rex M., et al.. (2012). Design, implementation, and evaluation of population-specific telehealth nursing services.. PubMed. 29(5). 265–72. 9 indexed citations
8.
Seto, Winnie, et al.. (2011). Utilizing a Diabetic Registry to Manage Diabetes in a Low-Income Asian American Population. Population Health Management. 15(4). 207–215. 5 indexed citations
9.
Hueckel, Rémi M., et al.. (2011). Implementation of Condition Help. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 27(2). 176–181. 28 indexed citations
10.
McConnell, Eleanor S., Kirsten Corazzini, Deborah Lekan, et al.. (2011). Diffusion of Innovations in Long-Term Care Measurement Battery. Research in Gerontological Nursing. 5(1). 64–76. 12 indexed citations
11.
Corazzini, Kirsten, Eleanor S. McConnell, Ruth A. Anderson, et al.. (2010). The importance of organizational climate to training needs and outcomes in long-term care. 11(2). 109–121. 7 indexed citations
12.
Michener, J. Lloyd, Michelle Lyn, Mary T. Champagne, et al.. (2008). Improving the Health of the Community: Duke??s Experience with Community Engagement. Academic Medicine. 83(4). 408–413. 46 indexed citations
13.
Michener, J. Lloyd, et al.. (2006). Just for Us: An Academic Medical Center–Community Partnership to Maintain the Health of a Frail Low-Income Senior Population. The Gerontologist. 46(2). 271–276. 41 indexed citations
14.
Michener, J. Lloyd, et al.. (2004). Making a Home in the Community for the Academic Medical Center. Academic Medicine. 80(1). 57–61. 16 indexed citations
15.
Bergstrom, Nancy, Barbara Braden, Mildred G. Kemp, Mary T. Champagne, & Elizabeth Ruby. (1998). Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk. Nursing Research. 47(5). 261–269. 306 indexed citations
16.
Miller, Judith, Virginia J. Neelon, Mary T. Champagne, et al.. (1997). The assessment of acute confusion as part of nursing care. Applied Nursing Research. 10(3). 143–151. 17 indexed citations
17.
Funk, Sandra G., et al.. (1995). Administrators' views on barriers to research utilization. Applied Nursing Research. 8(1). 44–49. 90 indexed citations
18.
Tornquist, Elizabeth M., et al.. (1993). Advice on reading research: Overcoming the barriers. Applied Nursing Research. 6(4). 177–183. 4 indexed citations
19.
Funk, Sandra G., et al.. (1991). Barriers to using research findings in practice: The clinician's perspective. Applied Nursing Research. 4(2). 90–95. 300 indexed citations
20.
Harrell, Joanne S., et al.. (1990). Teaching Cardiovascular Assessment. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 21(6). 241–244. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026