David E. Block

102 papers receiving 4.7k citations

Peers

David E. Block
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Food Science 632
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 358
  • Biomedical Engineering 614
  • Molecular Biology 906
  • Biotechnology 33
Replace Martin J. T. Reaney with:
Martin J. T. Reaney Canada
Martin R. Okos United States
Afroditi Chatzifragkou United Kingdom
Ian S. Maddox New Zealand
Yu‐Yen Linko Finland
Ruohang Wang United Kingdom
Francisco Maugeri Brazil
Emilia María Guadix Spain
Yves Pouliot Canada
Guang-Lei Liu China
David E. Block relative to Martin J. T. Reaney Canada Martin J. T. Reaney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Martin J. T. Reaney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David E. Block

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David E. Block's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David E. Block with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David E. Block more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David E. Block

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David E. Block. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David E. Block. The network helps show where David E. Block may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David E. Block, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David E. Block Line = papers co-authored together David E. Block links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 102 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010471
2 2014394
3 2010252
4 2011231
5 2011166
6 2020162
7 2016146
8 2005135
9 2011125
10 2014123
11 2012113
12 2008109
13 2001105
14 201297
15 200787
16 200282
17 200776
18 201176
19 201066
20 200164

About David E. Block

David E. Block is a scholar working on Food Science, Biomedical Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research, Molecular Biology and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 102 papers that have together received 4.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (24 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (7 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (6 papers), Catalysis for Biomass Conversion (5 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (4 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (3 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (3 papers) and Fungal and yeast genetics research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (632 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (358 citations), Biomedical Engineering (614 citations), Molecular Biology (906 citations) and Biotechnology (33 citations). David E. Block has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Thailand and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include David Andrew Mills, Bruce C. Gates, Ron C. Runnebaum, Tarit Nimmanwudipong, J. Bruce German, Jae‐Han Kim, Marjorie L. Longo, Keith Baar, Clark M. Henderson and John W. Froehlich. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Catalysis Letters, Applied and Environmental Microbiology and Molecules.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact