David Booth

14 papers receiving 256 citations

Peers

David Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 101
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 78
  • Social Psychology 71
  • Developmental Neuroscience 9
  • Conservation 6
Replace Matthias Winfried Kleespies with:
Matthias Winfried Kleespies Germany
Alexander Georg Büssing Germany
G. Montagu Benton United States
Alex Kudryavtsev United States
Nicole Holthuis United States
Louis A. Iozzi United States
Emilia Fägerstam Sweden
B. Troy Frensley United States
Daniela Sellmann-Risse Germany
Miyoun Lim United States
David Booth relative to Matthias Winfried Kleespies Germany Matthias Winfried Kleespies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Matthias Winfried Kleespies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Booth. The network helps show where David Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside David Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Booth Line = papers co-authored together David Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201569
2 202063
3 202040
4
The department chair : professional development and role conflict
198226
5 202122
6 202219
7 199012
8 19846
9 20205
10
The Department Chair: Professional Development and Role Conflict. AAHE-ERIC/Higher Education Research Report No. 10, 1982.
19825
11 19784
12 20203
13
The Training of New Department Chairmen. The Need, Present and Proposed Programs.
19693
14 20211
15 20240

About David Booth

David Booth is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Social Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Infectious Diseases, having authored 15 papers that have together received 278 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban Green Space and Health (5 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (4 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (2 papers), Health and Lifestyle Studies (1 paper), Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases (1 paper), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (1 paper), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (1 paper) and Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (101 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (78 citations), Social Psychology (71 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (9 citations) and Conservation (6 citations). David Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Alexia Barrable, Gary Beauchamp, J. Kim Dale, Philip A. Seymour, Emma A. Hall, Palle Serup, John G. Reid, Paul Axelrod, Stephen C. Land and Graham Rena. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, The Canadian Journal of Sociology, Development, Frontiers in Psychology and Teaching Sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact