David Batts

415 total citations
11 papers, 166 citations indexed

About

David Batts is a scholar working on Education, Social Psychology and Management of Technology and Innovation. According to data from OpenAlex, David Batts has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 166 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Education, 3 papers in Social Psychology and 2 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation. Recurrent topics in David Batts's work include Online and Blended Learning (5 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (3 papers) and Management and Marketing Education (2 papers). David Batts is often cited by papers focused on Online and Blended Learning (5 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (3 papers) and Management and Marketing Education (2 papers). David Batts collaborates with scholars based in United States. David Batts's co-authors include Michael J. Bossé, Cathy W. Hall, Paul Kauffmann, Cheryl McFadden and Carolyn Dunn and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Technology Education, Community College Journal of Research and Practice and The Scholarship East Carolina University's Institutional Repository (East Carolina University).

In The Last Decade

David Batts

10 papers receiving 140 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Batts United States 5 103 67 34 32 25 11 166
Mehmet C. Ayar Türkiye 6 189 1.8× 62 0.9× 18 0.5× 71 2.2× 24 1.0× 20 295
Kelly J. Cunningham United States 9 201 2.0× 106 1.6× 29 0.9× 79 2.5× 21 0.8× 14 307
Ananya M. Matewos United States 9 143 1.4× 35 0.5× 35 1.0× 52 1.6× 21 0.8× 11 251
Lisa Martin‐Hansen United States 6 181 1.8× 39 0.6× 25 0.7× 75 2.3× 36 1.4× 18 272
Toni Ivey United States 10 213 2.1× 63 0.9× 22 0.6× 89 2.8× 23 0.9× 22 301
M. Sencer Çorlu Türkiye 9 245 2.4× 22 0.3× 17 0.5× 49 1.5× 11 0.4× 30 303
Malinda Faber United States 5 187 1.8× 126 1.9× 60 1.8× 78 2.4× 31 1.2× 7 323
Elizabeth Ring-Whalen United States 6 182 1.8× 46 0.7× 23 0.7× 77 2.4× 7 0.3× 11 258
Anita Patrick United States 10 110 1.1× 156 2.3× 24 0.7× 27 0.8× 25 1.0× 19 270
Cathy Lachapelle United States 9 198 1.9× 71 1.1× 29 0.9× 99 3.1× 20 0.8× 24 299

Countries citing papers authored by David Batts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Batts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Batts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Batts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Batts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Batts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Batts. The network helps show where David Batts may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Batts

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Batts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Batts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Batts. David Batts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Batts, David, et al.. (2020). Preparation For Online Teaching And Actual Practices For Technology Oriented Courses. 12.1173.1–12.1173.19. 1 indexed citations
2.
Batts, David, et al.. (2020). Development Of Effective Online Learning Systems For Technology Oriented Courses. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 12.532.1–12.532.10. 1 indexed citations
3.
Kauffmann, Paul, et al.. (2020). Factors Influencing High School Students’ Career Considerations In Stem Fields. 14.624.1–14.624.11. 4 indexed citations
4.
Dunn, Carolyn, et al.. (2020). How Educational Institutions can Handle More Students with Fewer Faculty Members. 22.784.1–22.784.13. 1 indexed citations
5.
Batts, David, et al.. (2013). Transforming the Terminal Associates of Applied Science into a Four-Year Degree: A Win-Win Situation for Students, Community Colleges, Universities, and Businesses. Community College Journal of Research and Practice. 37(5). 365–373. 4 indexed citations
6.
Hall, Cathy W., et al.. (2011). Are We Missing Opportunities to Encourage Interest in STEM Fields?. Journal of Technology Education. 23(1). 115 indexed citations
7.
Batts, David, et al.. (2010). Training for Faculty Who Teach Online.. 16(2). 21–31. 5 indexed citations
8.
Batts, David, et al.. (2009). Desired Versus Actual Training for Online Instructors in Community Colleges. The Scholarship East Carolina University's Institutional Repository (East Carolina University). 12(4). 17 indexed citations
9.
Batts, David, et al.. (2009). Using Distance Education for Cost Effective Delivery. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2009(1). 801–803. 1 indexed citations
10.
Batts, David, et al.. (2008). Comparison of Student and Instructor Perceptions of Best Practices in Online Technology Courses. 14 indexed citations
11.
Batts, David. (2005). Perceived agreement between student and instructor on the use of the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education in online courses. 1–101. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026