Daniela Jäger-Biela

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 974 citations indexed

About

Daniela Jäger-Biela is a scholar working on Education, Information Systems and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniela Jäger-Biela has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 974 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Education, 4 papers in Information Systems and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Daniela Jäger-Biela's work include Digital literacy in education (4 papers), Education Methods and Technologies (4 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (3 papers). Daniela Jäger-Biela is often cited by papers focused on Digital literacy in education (4 papers), Education Methods and Technologies (4 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (3 papers). Daniela Jäger-Biela collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Estonia and Belgium. Daniela Jäger-Biela's co-authors include Johannes König, Nina Glutsch, Martin Rothland, Michael Becker-Mrotzek, Alfred Schabmann, Kai Kaspar and Sarah Strauß and has published in prestigious journals such as Education and Information Technologies, European Journal of Teacher Education and Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability.

In The Last Decade

Daniela Jäger-Biela

9 papers receiving 896 citations

Hit Papers

Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closur... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniela Jäger-Biela Germany 5 674 412 238 87 79 9 974
Nina Glutsch Germany 5 789 1.2× 414 1.0× 244 1.0× 116 1.3× 101 1.3× 11 1.1k
A. Patricia Aguilera-Hermida United States 4 589 0.9× 266 0.6× 324 1.4× 118 1.4× 98 1.2× 5 960
Christoph Helm Austria 13 501 0.7× 189 0.5× 230 1.0× 120 1.4× 131 1.7× 62 850
Soheil Salha Palestinian Territory 14 459 0.7× 225 0.5× 164 0.7× 51 0.6× 98 1.2× 46 794
Alexander C. Thurman United States 4 593 0.9× 258 0.6× 165 0.7× 48 0.6× 60 0.8× 5 831
Reza Rachmadtullah Indonesia 18 1.3k 2.0× 637 1.5× 155 0.7× 40 0.5× 102 1.3× 85 1.6k
Chao‐Hsiu Chen Taiwan 11 691 1.0× 283 0.7× 100 0.4× 73 0.8× 195 2.5× 14 1.0k
Nina Bergdahl Sweden 10 416 0.6× 208 0.5× 88 0.4× 73 0.8× 91 1.2× 23 794
Longjun Zhou China 6 269 0.4× 150 0.4× 160 0.7× 46 0.5× 63 0.8× 34 529
Hakan Polat Türkiye 10 339 0.5× 164 0.4× 89 0.4× 52 0.6× 67 0.8× 25 625

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Jäger-Biela

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Jäger-Biela's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Jäger-Biela with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Jäger-Biela more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Jäger-Biela

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Jäger-Biela. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Jäger-Biela. The network helps show where Daniela Jäger-Biela may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniela Jäger-Biela

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniela Jäger-Biela. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniela Jäger-Biela based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniela Jäger-Biela. Daniela Jäger-Biela is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Jäger-Biela, Daniela, et al.. (2023). Lernendenfeedback für Lehramtsstudierende im Praxissemester. Digital-gestütztes Lernen im CAP-Projekt. Pedocs (German Institute for International Educational Research). 1 indexed citations
3.
Jäger-Biela, Daniela, et al.. (2023). Preservice teachers' professional knowledge for ICT integration in the classroom: Analysing its structure and its link to teacher education. Education and Information Technologies. 29(9). 11043–11075. 4 indexed citations
4.
Strauß, Sarah, et al.. (2023). In welchem Zusammenhang stehen Überzeugungen zur inklusiven Bildung von angehenden Lehrkräften mit Merkmalen ihrer Lehramtsausbildung?. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik. 350–373. 1 indexed citations
6.
König, Johannes, et al.. (2022). Teachers’ professional knowledge for teaching early literacy: conceptualization, measurement, and validation. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability. 34(4). 483–507. 12 indexed citations
7.
König, Johannes, et al.. (2022). ICT integration in teachers’ lesson plans: A scoping review of empirical studies. European Journal of Teacher Education. 47(4). 821–849. 33 indexed citations
8.
König, Johannes, Daniela Jäger-Biela, & Nina Glutsch. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education. 43(4). 608–622. 908 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Jäger-Biela, Daniela, Kai Kaspar, & Johannes König. (2020). Lerngelegenheiten zum Erwerb von digitalisierungsbezogenen Medienkompetenzen. Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln). 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026