Daniel P. Corts

455 citations
10 papers · 237 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel P. Corts

10 papers receiving 183 citations

Peers

Daniel P. Corts
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 85
  • Language and Linguistics 53
  • Speech and Hearing 35
  • Sensory Systems 17
  • Education 90
Replace Éva Vass with:
Éva Vass Australia
Daniel Lawless Canada
Dorothy Heathcote United Kingdom
Ana Marjanović-Shane United States
Eduardo Urios-Aparisi Poland
Nicola Daly New Zealand
Andrew Lambirth United Kingdom
M. Kay Alderman United States
Betty Jane Wagner United States
Rebecca Kantor United States
Daniel P. Corts relative to Éva Vass Australia Éva Vass's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Éva Vass · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel P. Corts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel P. Corts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel P. Corts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel P. Corts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel P. Corts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel P. Corts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel P. Corts. The network helps show where Daniel P. Corts may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Daniel P. Corts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel P. Corts Line = papers co-authored together Daniel P. Corts links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1
Assessing Undergraduate Satisfaction with an Academic Department: A Method and Case Study
200047
2 199944
3 201738
4 200231
5 200328
6
Parental Involvement and the Theory of Planned Behavior
201219
7 200617
8
The College Motives Scale: Classifying Motives for Entering College
20119
9
Measuring Attitudes towards Sorority and Fraternity Members: Indication of Implicit, Ingroup Favoritism.
20083
10 20191

About Daniel P. Corts

Daniel P. Corts is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Education, Language and Linguistics, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 237 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (3 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (2 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (2 papers), Diverse Education Studies and Reforms (1 paper), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (1 paper), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (1 paper) and Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (85 citations), Language and Linguistics (53 citations), Speech and Hearing (35 citations), Sensory Systems (17 citations) and Education (90 citations). Daniel P. Corts has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Howard R. Pollio, Holly E. Tatum, John W. Lounsbury, Richard A. Saudargas, Yu-Hsiang Wu, Diana Irwin, Ann Perreau and Alessandra Gaia. Their work appears in journals such as Metaphor and Symbol, Discourse Studies, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology and College Teaching.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact