College Teaching

19.2k citations
1.3k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Education top 2%
    • Online and Blended Learning
    • Evaluation of Teaching Practices
    • Innovative Teaching Methods
    • Education and Critical Thinking Development
    • Reflective Practices in Education
    • Student Assessment and Feedback
    • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Papers in

    • Evaluation of Teaching Practices 226
    • Online and Blended Learning 209
    • Reflective Practices in Education 144
    • Education and Critical Thinking Development 122
    • Innovative Teaching Methods 89
    • Student Assessment and Feedback 69
    • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods 124

College Teaching

958 papers receiving 14.8k citations

Peers

College Teaching
Comparison fields: 5 of 192
  • Education 13.2k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 3.3k
  • Library and Information Sciences 362
  • Computer Science Applications 1.2k
  • Social Psychology 2.9k
Replace New Directions for Teaching and Learning with:
New Directions for Teaching and Learning United States
Innovative Higher Education United States
Academe United States
Teaching in Higher Education United Kingdom
Innovations in Education and Teaching International United Kingdom
Journal of Further and Higher Education United Kingdom
Adult Education Quarterly United States
The Educational Forum United States
TechTrends United States
International Journal of Qualitative Methods Canada
College Teaching relative to New Directions for Teaching and Learning United States New Directions for Teaching and Learning's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
New Directions for Teaching and Learning · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in College Teaching

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in College Teaching. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in College Teaching with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites College Teaching more than expected).

Fields of papers published in College Teaching

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in College Teaching. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in College Teaching.

About College Teaching

The 1.3k papers published in College Teaching in the last decades have received a total of 19.2k indexed citations . Papers published in College Teaching usually cover Education (786 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (203 papers), Library and Information Sciences (21 papers), Social Psychology (193 papers) and Management of Technology and Innovation (42 papers) specifically the topics of Evaluation of Teaching Practices (226 papers), Online and Blended Learning (209 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (144 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (142 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (124 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (122 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (89 papers) and Student Assessment and Feedback (69 papers). The most active scholars publishing in College Teaching are Alison King, Anthony F. Grasha, Tim van Gelder, Richard M. Felder, Rebecca Brent, Randy Garner, Steven A. Meyers, Joel Michael, Kellah M. Edens and Deborah R. Tindell.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact