Countries citing papers authored by Daniel L. Duke
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel L. Duke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel L. Duke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel L. Duke more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel L. Duke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel L. Duke. The network helps show where Daniel L. Duke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel L. Duke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel L. Duke.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel L. Duke based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel L. Duke. Daniel L. Duke is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Burbach, Harold J. & Daniel L. Duke. (2007). Deep Smarts: How to Tap Teachers' Tacit Knowledge.. Principal leadership. 7(9). 34–37.3 indexed citations
6.
Duke, Daniel L.. (2004). The Turnaround Principal: High-Stakes Leadership.. Principal. 84(1). 12–23.22 indexed citations
7.
Duke, Daniel L.. (1998). Challenges of Designing the Next Generation of America's Schools.. Phi Delta Kappan. 79(9). 688.2 indexed citations
8.
Duke, Daniel L., et al.. (1998). Where Our Children Learn Matters: A Report on the Virginia School Facilities Impact Study.. 36(3). 23–26.5 indexed citations
9.
Duke, Daniel L.. (1993). Removing Barriers to Professional Growth.. Phi Delta Kappan. 74(9). 702.19 indexed citations
10.
Duke, Daniel L.. (1992). The Rhetoric and the Reality of Reform in Educational Administration.. Phi Delta Kappan. 73(10).10 indexed citations
11.
Duke, Daniel L.. (1990). Setting Goals for Professional Development.. Educational leadership. 47(8). 71–75.15 indexed citations
12.
Duke, Daniel L.. (1986). Understanding What It Means to Be a Teacher.. Educational leadership. 44(2). 26–32.3 indexed citations
13.
Duke, Daniel L.. (1985). What Is the Nature of Educational Excellence and Should We Try to Measure It. Phi Delta Kappan. 66(10).7 indexed citations
14.
Duke, Daniel L. & Vernon Jones. (1984). Two Decades of Discipline--Assessing the Development of an Educational Specialization.. Journal of research and development in education. 17(4). 25–35.7 indexed citations
15.
Duke, Daniel L.. (1981). Running Faster to Stay in Place: Retrenchment in the New York City Schools.. Phi Delta Kappan. 63(1). 13–17.3 indexed citations
16.
Duke, Daniel L.. (1980). Making School Discipline Policy in the Eighties: Options, Illusions, and Dreams.. Contemporary education. 52(1). 24–29.1 indexed citations
17.
Duke, Daniel L., et al.. (1980). The Slow Death of a Public High School.. Phi Delta Kappan. 61(10).8 indexed citations
Duke, Daniel L.. (1978). How Administrators View the Crisis in School Discipline.. Phi Delta Kappan.14 indexed citations
20.
Duke, Daniel L.. (1978). Emerging Legal Issues Related to Classroom Management. Phi Delta Kappan. 60(4). 495–506.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.