D. Wang

29 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

D. Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 346
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 377
  • Biomedical Engineering 875
  • Analytical Chemistry 163
  • Biophysics 69
Replace Tesfaye Tesso with:
Tesfaye Tesso United States
Gary R. Gamble United States
Jiangfeng Huang China
S. R. Eckhoff United States
Mette Marie Løkke Denmark
Ronald L. Madl United States
H.S.S. Sharma United Kingdom
KeShun Liu United States
Liangcai Peng China
Gabriel Paës France
D. Wang relative to Tesfaye Tesso United States Tesfaye Tesso's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Tesfaye Tesso · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Wang. The network helps show where D. Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. Wang Line = papers co-authored together D. Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010189
2 2008128
3 2008119
4 200795
5 201093
6 200680
7 200467
8 200565
9 200656
10 200648
11 200245
12 200540
13 200838
14 200937
15 200834
16 200129
17 200229
18 201129
19 201022
20 201421

About D. Wang

D. Wang is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Nutrition and Dietetics, Agronomy and Crop Science, Molecular Biology and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biofuel production and bioconversion (20 papers), Food composition and properties (14 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (11 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (6 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (5 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (2 papers) and Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (346 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (377 citations), Biomedical Engineering (875 citations), Analytical Chemistry (163 citations) and Biophysics (69 citations). D. Wang has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Scott R. Bean, Xiaorong Wu, Floyd E. Dowell, Scott Staggenborg, Renyong Zhao, Mitchell R. Tuinstra, Paul A. Seib, Xiuzhi Susan Sun, Ronald L. Madl and Mohan Ram. Their work appears in journals such as Cereal Chemistry, Industrial Crops and Products, International Journal of Food Properties, Transactions of the ASABE and Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact