Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Craig A. Mertler
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Craig A. Mertler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig A. Mertler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig A. Mertler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Craig A. Mertler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig A. Mertler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig A. Mertler. The network helps show where Craig A. Mertler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Craig A. Mertler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Craig A. Mertler.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Craig A. Mertler based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Craig A. Mertler. Craig A. Mertler is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mertler, Craig A. & Rachel Vannatta Reinhart. (2016). Advanced and Multivariate Statistical Methods.297 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Mertler, Craig A.. (2013). Classroom-Based Action Research: Revisiting the Process as Customizable and Meaningful Professional Development for Educators. University of Bedfordshire Repository (University of Bedfordshire). 3(3).14 indexed citations
7.
Mertler, Craig A.. (2010). Teachers' Perceptions of the Influence of No Child Left Behind On Classroom Practices. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.20 indexed citations
8.
Mertler, Craig A.. (2004). Secondary Teachers' Assessment Literacy: Does Classroom Experience Make A Difference?. American secondary education. 33(1). 49–64.108 indexed citations
9.
Mertler, Craig A.. (2003). Preservice Versus Inservice Teachers' Assessment Literacy: Does Classroom Experience Make a Difference?..39 indexed citations
Mertler, Craig A.. (2002). Demonstrating the Potential for Web-Based Survey Methodology with a Case Study.. American secondary education. 30(2). 49–61.28 indexed citations
12.
Mertler, Craig A.. (2002). Using Standardized Test Data To Guide Instruction and Intervention. ERIC Digest..4 indexed citations
Mertler, Craig A.. (2001). Lessons Learned from the Administration of a Web-Based Survey..4 indexed citations
15.
Mertler, Craig A.. (2000). Teacher-Centered Fallacies of Classroom Assessment Validity and Reliability.. ScholarWorks@BGSU (Bowling Green State University). 13(4). 29–35.8 indexed citations
16.
Mertler, Craig A.. (1999). Teacher Perceptions of Students as Stakeholders in Teacher Evaluation.. American secondary education. 27(3). 17–30.4 indexed citations
Mertler, Craig A.. (1992). Teacher motivation and job satisfaction of public school teachers. OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network).10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.