Marjorie L. Prokosch
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Sarah E. HillDanielle J. DelPrioreGary W. BoehmVladas GriskeviciusAndrew M. KramerDamian R. MurrayChristopher D. RodehefferMicah J. Eimerbrink
- Topics
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (8 papers)Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (8 papers)Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Marjorie L. Prokosch
23 papers receiving 400 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Cognitive Neuroscience 134
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 125
- Social Psychology 114
- Clinical Psychology 88
- Sociology and Political Science 77
Countries citing papers authored by Marjorie L. Prokosch
This map shows the geographic impact of Marjorie L. Prokosch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marjorie L. Prokosch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marjorie L. Prokosch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marjorie L. Prokosch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marjorie L. Prokosch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marjorie L. Prokosch. The network helps show where Marjorie L. Prokosch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marjorie L. Prokosch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marjorie L. Prokosch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marjorie L. Prokosch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marjorie L. Prokosch. Marjorie L. Prokosch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 48 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 92 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 35 | |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Marjorie L. Prokosch
Marjorie L. Prokosch is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 401 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (8 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (8 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (48 citations), Applied Psychology (68 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (25 citations). Marjorie L. Prokosch has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sarah E. Hill, Danielle J. DelPriore, Gary W. Boehm, Vladas Griskevicius, Andrew M. Kramer, Damian R. Murray, Christopher D. Rodeheffer, Micah J. Eimerbrink, Jordon D. White and Joshua M. Ackerman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.