Kate Ranganath

1.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
4 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Kate Ranganath is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Kate Ranganath has authored 4 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 1 paper in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Kate Ranganath's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper). Kate Ranganath is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper). Kate Ranganath collaborates with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Kate Ranganath's co-authors include Brian A. Nosek, Colin Tucker Smith, Mahzarin R. Banaji, Frederick L. Smyth, Jeffrey J. Hansen, Nicole M. Lindner, Thierry Devos, Kristina R. Olson, Dolly Chugh and Anthony G. Greenwald and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Science, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology and Perspectives on Psychological Science.

In The Last Decade

Kate Ranganath

4 papers receiving 993 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes

2007 787 citations Brian A. Nosek, Frederick L. Smyth et al. European Review of Social Psychology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Kate Ranganath United States	4	769	451	195	188	137	4	1.1k
Jeffrey J. Hansen United States	5	682 0.9×	376 0.8×	162 0.8×	189 1.0×	107 0.8×	7	956
Nicole M. Lindner United States	6	664 0.9×	340 0.8×	142 0.7×	184 1.0×	88 0.6×	9	967
Juan Manuel Falomir‐Pichastor Switzerland	19	899 1.2×	655 1.5×	148 0.8×	286 1.5×	223 1.6×	99	1.4k
Keon West United Kingdom	19	782 1.0×	652 1.4×	144 0.7×	270 1.4×	88 0.6×	52	1.3k
Sjoerd F. Pennekamp Netherlands	6	996 1.3×	679 1.5×	166 0.9×	144 0.8×	122 0.9×	8	1.4k
Jeffrey G. Noel United States	11	672 0.9×	525 1.2×	110 0.6×	140 0.7×	86 0.6×	19	1.1k
Andrew L. Stewart United States	11	799 1.0×	495 1.1×	144 0.7×	240 1.3×	68 0.5×	21	1.1k
Muriel Dumont Belgium	12	722 0.9×	456 1.0×	146 0.7×	385 2.0×	57 0.4×	19	1.0k
Tessa Elizabeth Sadie Charlesworth United States	13	441 0.6×	260 0.6×	106 0.5×	247 1.3×	53 0.4×	27	955
Kristjen B. Lundberg United States	10	522 0.7×	370 0.8×	126 0.6×	96 0.5×	91 0.7×	16	828

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Ranganath

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Ranganath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Ranganath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Ranganath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Ranganath

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Ranganath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Ranganath. The network helps show where Kate Ranganath may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Ranganath

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Ranganath. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Ranganath based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Ranganath. Kate Ranganath is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

4 of 4 papers shown

1.

Ranganath, Kate, Barbara A. Spellman, & Jennifer A. Joy-Gaba. (2010). Cognitive “Category-Based Induction” Research and Social “Persuasion” Research Are Each About What Makes Arguments Believable. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 5(2). 115–122. 17 indexed citations

2.

Ranganath, Kate & Brian A. Nosek. (2008). Implicit Attitude Generalization Occurs Immediately; Explicit Attitude Generalization Takes Time. Psychological Science. 19(3). 249–254. 96 indexed citations

3.

Ranganath, Kate, Colin Tucker Smith, & Brian A. Nosek. (2007). Distinguishing automatic and controlled components of attitudes from direct and indirect measurement methods. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 44(2). 386–396. 155 indexed citations

4.

Nosek, Brian A., Frederick L. Smyth, Jeffrey J. Hansen, et al.. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology. 18(1). 36–88. 787 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact