Christian Münch
Impact in
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 2%
- Cell Biology top 2%
- Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
Papers in
-
- Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism 10
- Co-authors
- Anne BertolottiKevin KlannJ. Wade HarperJohn E. O’BrienJindřich ČinátlDenisa BojkováSandra CiesekGeorg Tascher
- Journals
- Molecular Cell (6 papers)Nature (5 papers)Cells (5 papers)Journal of Molecular Biology (4 papers)Autophagy (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Christian Münch
87 papers receiving 4.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 195
- Cell Biology 655
- Molecular Biology 2.8k
- Aging 63
- Infectious Diseases 602
Countries citing papers authored by Christian Münch
This map shows the geographic impact of Christian Münch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christian Münch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christian Münch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christian Münch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christian Münch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christian Münch. The network helps show where Christian Münch may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christian Münch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 9 | A cytosolic surveillance mechanism activates the mitochondrial UPR Hit paper breakdown → | 2023 | 116 |
| 10 | 2023 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 41 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 74 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 24 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 43 | |
| 17 | Proteomics of SARS-CoV-2-infected host cells reveals therapy targets Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 642 |
| 18 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 84 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 127 |
About Christian Münch
Christian Münch is a scholar working on Physiology, Cancer Research, Cell Biology, Molecular Biology and Epidemiology, having authored 91 papers that have together received 4.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (24 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (13 papers), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (12 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (10 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (9 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (5 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (5 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (195 citations), Cell Biology (655 citations), Molecular Biology (2.8k citations), Aging (63 citations) and Infectious Diseases (602 citations). Christian Münch has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anne Bertolotti, Kevin Klann, J. Wade Harper, John E. O’Brien, Jindřich Činátl, Denisa Bojková, Sandra Ciesek, Georg Tascher, Benjamin Koch and David Krause. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Cell, Nature, Cells, Journal of Molecular Biology and Autophagy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.