Birgit Schäfer
Impact in
- Genetics top 5%
- Mesenchymal stem cell research
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Congenital heart defects research
Papers in ⓘ
- Virology 3
-
- Cancer Research and Treatments 4
- Co-authors
- Volker Dötsch (17 shared papers)Walter Fiedler (2 shared papers)K Kluge (2 shared papers)Ursula M. Gehling (2 shared papers)Klaus Pantel (2 shared papers)Gunter Schuch (2 shared papers)Marcus Otte (2 shared papers)Nerbil Kilic (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cell Death and Disease (3 papers)Cell Death and Differentiation (3 papers)PLoS ONE (3 papers)Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (2 papers)Blood (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Birgit Schäfer
33 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Genetics 244
- Molecular Biology 1.5k
- Oncology 537
- Cancer Research 230
- Biotechnology 130
Countries citing papers authored by Birgit Schäfer
This map shows the geographic impact of Birgit Schäfer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Birgit Schäfer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Birgit Schäfer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Birgit Schäfer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Birgit Schäfer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Birgit Schäfer. The network helps show where Birgit Schäfer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Birgit Schäfer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In vitro differentiation of endothelial cells from AC133-positive progenitor cells Hit paper breakdown → | 2000 | 795 |
| 2 | 2004 | 196 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 123 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 119 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 115 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 82 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 72 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 58 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 57 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 53 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 50 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 42 | |
| 13 | 1995 | 41 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 37 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 36 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 30 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 28 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 28 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 27 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 25 |
About Birgit Schäfer
Birgit Schäfer is a scholar working on Virology, Biotechnology, Oncology, Urology and Molecular Biology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (11 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (5 papers), Cancer Research and Treatments (4 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (3 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (2 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (2 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (2 papers) and Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (244 citations), Molecular Biology (1.5k citations), Oncology (537 citations), Cancer Research (230 citations) and Biotechnology (130 citations). Birgit Schäfer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Volker Dötsch, Walter Fiedler, K Kluge, Ursula M. Gehling, Klaus Pantel, Gunter Schuch, Marcus Otte, Nerbil Kilic, Udo Schumacher and Dieter K. Hossfeld. Their work appears in journals such as Cell Death and Disease, Cell Death and Differentiation, PLoS ONE, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology and Blood.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.