Christian Krämer

3.7k citations
75 papers · 2.3k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Christian Krämer

73 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Christian Krämer
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 985
  • Molecular Biology 1.2k
  • Structural Biology 25
  • Spectroscopy 249
  • Pharmacology 130
Replace Felice C. Lightstone with:
Felice C. Lightstone United States
David S. Cerutti United States
Duncan Poole United States
Markus A. Lill United States
Romelia Salomón–Ferrer United States
Vittorio Limongelli Italy
Marc C. Nicklaus United States
Zoe Cournia Greece
Marco De Vivo Italy
Jennifer Grant United Kingdom
Christian Krämer relative to Felice C. Lightstone United States Felice C. Lightstone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Felice C. Lightstone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christian Krämer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christian Krämer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christian Krämer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christian Krämer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christian Krämer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christian Krämer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christian Krämer. The network helps show where Christian Krämer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christian Krämer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christian Krämer Line = papers co-authored together Christian Krämer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012242
2 2013227
3 2011189
4 2012167
5 201084
6 199277
7 201873
8 201470
9 201767
10 201257
11 201453
12 201451
13 201346
14 201545
15 200742
16 200742
17 201941
18 201738
19 201535
20 201533

About Christian Krämer

Christian Krämer is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry, Spectroscopy and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 75 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (39 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (15 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (10 papers), Machine Learning in Materials Science (9 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (7 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (6 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (5 papers) and DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (985 citations), Molecular Biology (1.2k citations), Structural Biology (25 citations), Spectroscopy (249 citations) and Pharmacology (130 citations). Christian Krämer has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Peter Gedeck, Anna Vulpetti, Tuomo Kalliokoski, Paulette A. Greenidge, Klaus R. Liedl, Romain M. Wolf, Markus Meuwly, Julian E. Fuchs, Tobias Brixner and Jérôme Hert. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, ChemMedChem and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact