Markus A. Lill

91 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Hit Papers

Computer-aided drug design platform using PyMOL 2010 · 468 citations
4680+5+10Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Markus A. Lill
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 1.3k
  • Pharmacology 315
  • Molecular Biology 1.9k
  • Biophysics 120
  • Organic Chemistry 550
Replace Teague Sterling with:
Teague Sterling United States
Michael M. Mysinger United States
Kevin Hauser United States
Vı́ctor Guallar Spain
G. Madhavi Sastry India
Paul M. Selzer Germany
Michał Rostkowski Poland
Michel A. Cuendet Switzerland
Michael A. Walters United States
Mark B. Swindells United Kingdom
Markus A. Lill relative to Teague Sterling United States Teague Sterling's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Teague Sterling · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Markus A. Lill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Markus A. Lill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Markus A. Lill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Markus A. Lill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Markus A. Lill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Markus A. Lill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Markus A. Lill. The network helps show where Markus A. Lill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Markus A. Lill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Markus A. Lill Line = papers co-authored together Markus A. Lill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 93 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Computer-aided drug design platform using PyMOL
Hit paper breakdown →
2010468
2 2021153
3 2008139
4 2015134
5 2020123
6 2002120
7 2011119
8 2005119
9 2007106
10 2013104
11 200993
12 200488
13 200178
14 201174
15 201464
16 201355
17 200650
18 202046
19 200546
20 200143

About Markus A. Lill

Markus A. Lill is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Materials Chemistry, Genetics and Spectroscopy, having authored 93 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (46 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (33 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (15 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (13 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (10 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (9 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (8 papers) and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (1.3k citations), Pharmacology (315 citations), Molecular Biology (1.9k citations), Biophysics (120 citations) and Organic Chemistry (550 citations). Markus A. Lill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Matthew L. Danielson, Volkhard Helms, Angelo Vedani, Laura J. Kingsley, Max Dobler, Bingjie Hu, Martin Smieško, André Fischer, Manuel Sellner and Gregory L. Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics, ChemMedChem and The Journal of Chemical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact