Diana Thrush
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Atmospheric Science
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law top 10%
- Ocean Engineering
- Co-authors
- Kate BurninghamJane FieldingJulie BarnettGlynis M. BreakwellChris Fife‐SchawSara FullerKaren LucasKate Theobald
- Topics
- Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers)Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers)Environmental Education and Sustainability (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Global and Planetary ChangeSociology and Political ScienceGeography, Planning and Development
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Diana Thrush
9 papers receiving 468 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Sociology and Political Science 366
- Global and Planetary Change 248
- Atmospheric Science 69
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 49
- Ocean Engineering 31
Countries citing papers authored by Diana Thrush
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Thrush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Thrush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Thrush more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Thrush
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Thrush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Thrush. The network helps show where Diana Thrush may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Thrush
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Thrush. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Thrush based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Thrush. Diana Thrush is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 289 | |
| 3 | The limitations of the NIMBY concept for understanding public engagement with renewable energy technologies: a literature review | 78 |
| 4 | 56 | |
| 5 | Prioritising Local Environmental Concerns: Where There's a Will There's a Way | 6 |
| 6 | 36 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 7 |
About Diana Thrush
Diana Thrush is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Speech and Hearing, having authored 9 papers that have together received 499 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers) and Environmental Education and Sustainability (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (248 citations), Sociology and Political Science (366 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (23 citations). Diana Thrush has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kate Burningham, Jane Fielding, Julie Barnett, Glynis M. Breakwell, Chris Fife‐Schaw, Sara Fuller, Karen Lucas, Kate Theobald, Gordon Walker and David Infield. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Adolescence, Housing Studies and Disasters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.