Mary John

948 total citations
42 papers, 561 citations indexed

About

Mary John is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary John has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 561 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Clinical Psychology, 12 papers in General Health Professions and 6 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Mary John's work include Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (6 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (5 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers). Mary John is often cited by papers focused on Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (6 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (5 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers). Mary John collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. Mary John's co-authors include Dawn Querstret, Linda Morison, Mark Cropley, Karl Nunkoosing, Gillian Colville, Laura M. Simonds, Fiona C Warren, Sue Jackson, Paul Hanna and Stacey Kung and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Journal of Psychosomatic Research.

In The Last Decade

Mary John

39 papers receiving 539 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mary John United Kingdom 12 292 106 86 83 81 42 561
Brock Boudreau Canada 7 267 0.9× 102 1.0× 75 0.9× 41 0.5× 52 0.6× 7 519
Elizabeth Rubenstone United States 13 182 0.6× 109 1.0× 46 0.5× 63 0.8× 32 0.4× 20 422
Ove Heradstveit Norway 13 199 0.7× 107 1.0× 61 0.7× 86 1.0× 25 0.3× 33 449
Timothy J. Ozechowski United States 13 413 1.4× 178 1.7× 132 1.5× 23 0.3× 69 0.9× 23 647
Monica C. Skewes United States 15 307 1.1× 258 2.4× 119 1.4× 87 1.0× 29 0.4× 41 802
Kathrin Pietsch Germany 9 340 1.2× 85 0.8× 100 1.2× 85 1.0× 20 0.2× 10 516
Åse Sagatun Norway 13 303 1.0× 123 1.2× 98 1.1× 40 0.5× 49 0.6× 19 610
Simone Onrust Netherlands 12 391 1.3× 181 1.7× 121 1.4× 41 0.5× 25 0.3× 30 756
Jennifer L. Rounds‐Bryant United States 11 400 1.4× 208 2.0× 100 1.2× 35 0.4× 54 0.7× 16 755
Laura M. Garnier-Dykstra United States 14 232 0.8× 164 1.5× 133 1.5× 65 0.8× 40 0.5× 14 911

Countries citing papers authored by Mary John

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary John's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary John with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary John more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary John

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary John. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary John. The network helps show where Mary John may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary John

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary John. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary John based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary John. Mary John is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Orchard, Faith, et al.. (2025). Characteristics of young people referred for treatment of depression and anxiety in a school‐based mental health service. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 64(3). 744–756.
2.
John, Mary, et al.. (2024). A Community Perspective on Boxing, Well‐being and Young People. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 35(1). 3 indexed citations
4.
Satherley, Rose‐Marie, et al.. (2023). Reliability and validity of a parent‐reported screening tool for disordered eating in children and young people with type 1 diabetes. Diabetic Medicine. 41(4). e15256–e15256. 2 indexed citations
5.
Kung, Stacey, Ingrid Maijers, Mary John, et al.. (2022). Cannabis in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 64(5). e260–e284. 25 indexed citations
6.
Jones, Christina, Mary John, Debbie Cooke, et al.. (2021). PaRent InterventiOn to pRevent dIsordered eating in children with TYpe 1 diabetes (PRIORITY): Study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial. Diabetic Medicine. 39(4). e14738–e14738. 6 indexed citations
7.
Kung, Stacey, et al.. (2020). Cannabinoids in the Treatment of Insomnia Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. CNS Drugs. 34(12). 1217–1228. 25 indexed citations
8.
John, Mary, et al.. (2020). Families' Experiences of Life in the Year after a Child's Critical Illness: Navigating the Road to a “New Normal”. Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care. 9(3). 188–195. 5 indexed citations
9.
Patton, Robert, et al.. (2020). The impact of multiple chemical sensitivity on people's social and occupational functioning; a systematic review of qualitative research studies. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 132. 109964–109964. 15 indexed citations
10.
John, Mary, et al.. (2019). Keeping secrets: how children in foster care manage stigma. Adoption & Fostering. 43(1). 35–45. 34 indexed citations
11.
John, Mary, et al.. (2018). How children in foster care engage with loyalty conflict: presenting a model of processes informing loyalty. Adoption & Fostering. 42(4). 354–368. 12 indexed citations
12.
Simonds, Laura M., et al.. (2015). Development and validation of the Adolescent Shame-Proneness Scale.. Psychological Assessment. 28(5). 549–562. 8 indexed citations
13.
Morison, Linda, et al.. (2014). Are mental health services inherently feminised. Psychologist. 16 indexed citations
14.
John, Mary, et al.. (2014). Development of Measures to Assess Personal Recovery in Young People Treated in Specialist Mental Health Services. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 22(6). 513–524. 9 indexed citations
15.
Dunne, Eileen M., et al.. (2014). Investigating the Effects of Probiotics on Pneumococcal Colonization Using an <em>In Vitro</em> Adherence Assay. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 7 indexed citations
16.
Simonds, Laura M., et al.. (2013). Adolescents with Anxiety and Depression: Is Social Recovery Relevant?. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 21(4). 289–298. 34 indexed citations
17.
John, Mary, Eileen M. Dunne, Paul V. Licciardi, et al.. (2013). Otitis media among high-risk populations: can probiotics inhibit Streptococcus pneumoniae colonisation and the risk of disease?. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 32(9). 1101–1110. 9 indexed citations
18.
Colville, Gillian, et al.. (2012). A ‘biopsychosocial’ model for recovery: A grounded theory study of families’ journeys after a Paediatric Intensive Care Admission. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 28(3). 133–140. 32 indexed citations
19.
John, Mary, et al.. (2006). On Tensions and Causes for School Dropouts åÁV An Induced Linked Fuzzy Relational Mapping (ILFRM) Analysis. Advances in intelligent systems research. 2 indexed citations
20.
Nunkoosing, Karl & Mary John. (1997). Friendships, relationships and the management of rejection and loneliness by people with learning disabilities. 1(1). 10–18. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026