Ching‐I Teng

147 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

Ching‐I Teng
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Research and Theory 214
  • Information Systems and Management 968
  • Leadership and Management 122
  • Marketing 574
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 646
Replace Vicente González‐Romá with:
Vicente González‐Romá Spain
Dieter Zapf Germany
Gilad Chen United States
Greg L. Stewart United States
Daniel C. Ganster United States
Jennifer D. Nahrgang United States
John W. Lounsbury United States
Ruth Kanfer United States
Christopher J. L. Cunningham United States
Jessica Mesmer‐Magnus United States
Ching‐I Teng relative to Vicente González‐Romá Spain Vicente González‐Romá's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Vicente González‐Romá · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐I Teng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐I Teng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐I Teng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐I Teng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐I Teng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐I Teng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐I Teng. The network helps show where Ching‐I Teng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐I Teng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ching‐I Teng Line = papers co-authored together Ching‐I Teng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 155 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010191
2 2013125
3 2010118
4 2008114
5 2017104
6 2018103
7 201789
8 200884
9 200782
10 201779
11 201075
12 201173
13 201973
14 200971
15 201569
16 201567
17 201366
18 201963
19 201861
20 202060

About Ching‐I Teng

Ching‐I Teng is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Health Professions and Communication, having authored 155 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Marketing and Social Media (67 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (45 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (35 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (28 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (22 papers), Nursing education and management (18 papers), Digital Games and Media (18 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (214 citations), Information Systems and Management (968 citations), Leadership and Management (122 citations), Marketing (574 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (646 citations). Ching‐I Teng has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include T.C.E. Cheng, Gen‐Yih Liao, Fan‐Chen Tseng, Han-Chung Huang, Hao‐Yuan Chang, Yea‐Ing Lotus Shyu, May‐Kuen Wong, Tzu‐Ling Huang, Ming‐Yi Chen and Tsung‐Lan Chu. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, Internet Research, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Nursing Management and International Journal of Information Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact