Chih‐Wei Cheng

455 citations
31 papers · 375 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Chih‐Wei Cheng

28 papers receiving 366 citations

Peers

Chih‐Wei Cheng
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 156
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 248
  • Condensed Matter Physics 66
  • Materials Chemistry 137
  • Computational Mechanics 48
Replace A. G. Kozlov with:
A. G. Kozlov Russia
Samuel Queste France
S. Corodeanu Romania
Y. Nakamura Japan
Julia Osten Germany
Masafumi Nakada Japan
N. Tani Japan
Reza Sanatinia Sweden
J. P. Wang Singapore
Andrea Severino Italy
Chih‐Wei Cheng relative to A. G. Kozlov Russia A. G. Kozlov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.5×
A. G. Kozlov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chih‐Wei Cheng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chih‐Wei Cheng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chih‐Wei Cheng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chih‐Wei Cheng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chih‐Wei Cheng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chih‐Wei Cheng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chih‐Wei Cheng. The network helps show where Chih‐Wei Cheng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chih‐Wei Cheng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chih‐Wei Cheng Line = papers co-authored together Chih‐Wei Cheng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201160
2 201650
3 201230
4 201429
5 201227
6 201024
7 202221
8 201214
9 201313
10 200512
11 201312
12 20139
13 20149
14 20088
15 20138
16 20078
17 20127
18 20146
19 20186
20 20205

About Chih‐Wei Cheng

Chih‐Wei Cheng is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry, Condensed Matter Physics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 31 papers that have together received 375 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (20 papers), ZnO doping and properties (10 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (10 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (5 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (4 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (3 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (3 papers) and Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (156 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (248 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (66 citations), Materials Chemistry (137 citations) and Computational Mechanics (48 citations). Chih‐Wei Cheng has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include G. Chern, Wuwei Feng, Te‐Ho Wu, Chih‐Yung Lin, Y. Weng, Yuan‐Chieh Tseng, Moo-Chin Wang, Hung-Ming Chen, C.H. Huang and Chih‐Huang Lai. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Journal of Physics D Applied Physics, ACS Applied Electronic Materials and Applied Physics A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact