Chih-Ping Chen

23 papers receiving 393 citations

Peers

Chih-Ping Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Marketing 93
  • Communication 58
  • Information Systems and Management 54
  • Gender Studies 68
  • Literature and Literary Theory 74
Replace Mariah L. Wellman with:
Mariah L. Wellman United States
Stephan Sonnenburg Austria
Farid Tarrahi Germany
Alison B. Shields United States
Sascha Langner Germany
Rebecca Mardon United Kingdom
Josh Boyd United States
Gary Sinclair United Kingdom
Kathy Buckner United Kingdom
Andrew T. Norman United States
Chih-Ping Chen relative to Mariah L. Wellman United States Mariah L. Wellman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.5×
Mariah L. Wellman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chih-Ping Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chih-Ping Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chih-Ping Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chih-Ping Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chih-Ping Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chih-Ping Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chih-Ping Chen. The network helps show where Chih-Ping Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chih-Ping Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chih-Ping Chen Line = papers co-authored together Chih-Ping Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013103
2 2014101
3 201846
4 202130
5 201224
6 199721
7 199621
8 200415
9 201515
10 202211
11 20245
12 19965
13 20195
14
Mirror of beauty: Cultural values reflected in online skincare advertising in the Philippines and Taiwan
20173
15
Digital Self and Parasocial Interaction on Youtube
20133
16 20183
17
"Am I a Monster?": Jane Eyre among the Shadows of Freaks
20022
18 20242
19 20142
20 20192

About Chih-Ping Chen

Chih-Ping Chen is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Gender Studies, Marketing and Surgery, having authored 25 papers that have together received 424 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Marketing and Social Media (9 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (3 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (3 papers), Media Influence and Health (3 papers), Digital Games and Media (2 papers) and Urological Disorders and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (93 citations), Communication (58 citations), Information Systems and Management (54 citations), Gender Studies (68 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (74 citations). Chih-Ping Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Fenfen Liu, Sheau‐Wen Jan, Chung‐Chi Lan, Jin‐Cherng Sheu, Shin‐Lin Shih, Shih-Hung Huang, Chin-Yuan Tzen, Wayseen Wang, Chen‐Chi Lee and Schu‐Rern Chern. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Perinatology, Journal of Internet Commerce, Geomatics Natural Hazards and Risk, Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences and Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact