Chi-Chang Weng
- Molecular Biology
- Oncology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Robert H. MachChenbo ZengCatherine HouMehran MakvandiAladdin RiadKuiying XuMark A. SellmyerKun‐Ju Lin
- Topics
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (5 papers)Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (5 papers)Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Biological PsychiatryCellular and Molecular NeuroscienceRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Partner nations
- United StatesTaiwanZimbabwe
In The Last Decade
Chi-Chang Weng
25 papers receiving 712 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Molecular Biology 316
- Oncology 138
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 135
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 118
- Physiology 114
Countries citing papers authored by Chi-Chang Weng
This map shows the geographic impact of Chi-Chang Weng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chi-Chang Weng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chi-Chang Weng more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chi-Chang Weng
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chi-Chang Weng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chi-Chang Weng. The network helps show where Chi-Chang Weng may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chi-Chang Weng
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chi-Chang Weng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chi-Chang Weng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chi-Chang Weng. Chi-Chang Weng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 56 | |
| 10 | 39 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 76 | |
| 14 | 42 | |
| 15 | 97 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 103 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Chi-Chang Weng
Chi-Chang Weng is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Physiology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 722 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (5 papers), Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (5 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (28 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (135 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (118 citations). Chi-Chang Weng has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Zimbabwe. Frequent co-authors include Robert H. Mach, Chenbo Zeng, Catherine Hou, Mehran Makvandi, Aladdin Riad, Kuiying Xu, Mark A. Sellmyer, Kun‐Ju Lin, David A. Mankoff and Sean Carlin. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.