Cheng-Hao Chen

1.2k citations
44 papers · 802 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Cheng-Hao Chen

43 papers receiving 768 citations

Peers

Cheng-Hao Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Marketing 305
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 134
  • Information Systems and Management 78
  • Sociology and Political Science 283
  • Strategy and Management 83
Replace Kwame Simpe Ofori with:
Kwame Simpe Ofori Ghana
Sung‐Bum Kim South Korea
So Won Jeong South Korea
Scott Smith United States
Monica Law China
Chung‐Yu Wang Taiwan
Hanna Lee South Korea
Minjeong Kang South Korea
Spring H. Han United States
Pedro Quelhas Brito Portugal
Cheng-Hao Chen relative to Kwame Simpe Ofori Ghana Kwame Simpe Ofori's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.3×
Kwame Simpe Ofori · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheng-Hao Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheng-Hao Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheng-Hao Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheng-Hao Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheng-Hao Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheng-Hao Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheng-Hao Chen. The network helps show where Cheng-Hao Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cheng-Hao Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cheng-Hao Chen Line = papers co-authored together Cheng-Hao Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201774
2 201573
3 201667
4 201551
5 201548
6 200546
7 202136
8 201833
9 202130
10 202130
11 201828
12 202023
13 201923
14 202122
15 201921
16 201520
17 201416
18 201615
19 202013
20 202113

About Cheng-Hao Chen

Cheng-Hao Chen is a scholar working on Marketing, Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 44 papers that have together received 802 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (15 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (9 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (8 papers), Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (4 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (3 papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (3 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers) and 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (305 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (134 citations), Information Systems and Management (78 citations), Sociology and Political Science (283 citations) and Strategy and Management (83 citations). Cheng-Hao Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Bang Nguyen, Arnold Japutra, Sung H. Han, Xiaoyu Yu, Sebastián Molinillo, Philipp Klaus, Isabella Chaney, Tsung‐Tsong Wu, Jianhua Tong and T.C. Melewar. Their work appears in journals such as International Marketing Review, Service Industries Journal, Information Systems Frontiers, International Journal of Solids and Structures and Journal of World Business.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact