Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective
19872.1k citationsCharles F. Meyer et al.profile →
Citations per year, relative to Charles F. Meyer Charles F. Meyer (= 1×)
peers
George Yule
Countries citing papers authored by Charles F. Meyer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles F. Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles F. Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles F. Meyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles F. Meyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles F. Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles F. Meyer. The network helps show where Charles F. Meyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles F. Meyer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles F. Meyer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles F. Meyer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Charles F. Meyer. Charles F. Meyer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Meyer, Charles F.. (2023). English Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge University Press eBooks.2 indexed citations
Meyer, Charles F.. (2009). In the Profession. Journal of English Linguistics. 37(2). 208–213.4 indexed citations
4.
Meyer, Charles F.. (2006). Corpus Linguistics, the World Wide Web, and English Language Teaching. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.2 indexed citations
Percy, Carol, Charles F. Meyer, & Ian Lancashire. (1996). Synchronic corpus linguistics : papers from the sixteenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 16). Rodopi eBooks.13 indexed citations
Richichi, A., T. Chandrasekhar, F. Lisi, et al.. (1995). Sub-milliarcsecond resolution observations of two carbon stars: TX PISCIUM and Y Tauri revisited.. A&A. 301. 439.
Meyer, Charles F.. (1989). Functional Grammar and Its Application in the Compostion Classroom. The Journal of Teaching Writing. 8(2). 147–168.1 indexed citations
15.
Meyer, Charles F.. (1985). La vie quotidienne des Français en Indochine 1860-1910. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
16.
Meyer, Charles F., et al.. (1983). Reversejet scrubber for control of fine particulates.1 indexed citations
Meyer, Charles F., et al.. (1975). Energy conservation: is the heat storage well the key. [Electric power and hot water from the same plant].2 indexed citations
20.
Meyer, Charles F.. (1972). Surrogate modeling. Water Resources Research. 8(1). 212–216.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.