Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language
19873.0k citationsP Beauvais, Randolph Quirk et al.College Composition and Communicationprofile →
A Grammar of Contemporary English
19741.0k citationsRandolph Quirk, Sidney Greenbaum et al.Modern Language Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Sidney Greenbaum
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Sidney Greenbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sidney Greenbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sidney Greenbaum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sidney Greenbaum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sidney Greenbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sidney Greenbaum. The network helps show where Sidney Greenbaum may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sidney Greenbaum
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sidney Greenbaum.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sidney Greenbaum based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sidney Greenbaum. Sidney Greenbaum is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Greenbaum, Sidney & Edmund Weiner. (2000). The Oxford reference grammar. Oxford University Press eBooks.12 indexed citations
2.
Greenbaum, Sidney. (1996). Comparing English worldwide : the International Corpus of English. Oxford University Press eBooks.100 indexed citations
Greenbaum, Sidney. (1996). The Oxford English grammar. Medical Entomology and Zoology.174 indexed citations
5.
Greenbaum, Sidney & Jan Svartvik. (1990). The London-Lund corpus of spoken english.38 indexed citations
6.
Greenbaum, Sidney. (1989). The grammarians reply. English Today. 5(2). 9–13.1 indexed citations
7.
Beauvais, P, Randolph Quirk, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, & Jan Svartvik. (1987). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. College Composition and Communication. 38(2). 225–225.2988 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Cooper, Charles R. & Sidney Greenbaum. (1986). Studying writing : linguistic approaches. Sage eBooks.91 indexed citations
9.
Cooper, Charles R. & Sidney Greenbaum. (1986). Studying Writing: Linguistic Approaches. Written Communication Annual: An International Survey of Research and Theory Series, Volume 1..1 indexed citations
10.
Gaies, Stephen J. & Sidney Greenbaum. (1986). The English Language Today. Modern Language Journal. 70(3). 338–338.68 indexed citations
11.
Greenbaum, Sidney. (1983). What Is Grammar and Why Teach It. 63. 33–43.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.